Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by MechAg94 »

Dan20703 wrote:Family should have kept driving and called the police. Lucky it all turned out well for the intended victims.
I think I would have done this. If I parked, it would be near a police officer or at the police station.

As far as them owning guns, they might have had rifles packed in the back, but not a pistol or other gun ready for self defense.
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by seamusTX »

The problem with police stations is that some of them sometimes have no sworn officers on duty -- the sworn officers are all on patrol or responding to calls. Some police stations are even closed at times because of budget shortfalls.

This situation would be different in a larger town or city versus a small town.

I can vaguely recall a couple of cases where people were mugged or murdered outside police stations, and no one inside knew what was going on.

That's why I mentioned fire stations. They usually have more people on duty closer to the street.

- Jim
Fear, anger, hatred, and greed. The devil's all-you-can-eat buffet.
mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by mrvmax »

My co-workers son was with this family when this happened and I can add some relavent facts. This is second hand info my co-worker gave me the next day as told from his son, they spent the night in the police station after this happened just sorting out what was stolen and what was not.
1. They were driving down I-45 southbound with a trailer with atv's when a truck passed them at a high rate of speed (they were going about 80 and the BG's were passing them). The truck slowed quickly after passing them, pulled in front of them and started to stop very quickly. A wreck was avoided but this should have been the first sign of a possible problem.
2. When they exited in Texas City the truck was behind them. My co-workers sone commented on this but the driver blew it off. This was another sign of a problem.
3. While in their neighborhood the driver realized they were being followed (perhaps should have dialed 911).
4. He drove past their house and the truck of BG's pulled in front of them and blocked them in (with vehicles to either side and them in front with nowhere to go but to back up. This was impractical due to teh trailer).
5. The BG driver got out with a gun, the two BG passengers got out with guns. One had an "assault rifle", one had a sawed off shotgun, one had what looked like a Tec 9 (which was pointed at my co-workers son). These were all stolen as well as the truck they were driving.
6. The driver had handguns and other weapons, but none loaded and noine in the cab.
7. The BG's proceeded to pull out the mother and two kids. They actually threw one kid to the ground and kicked him in the head.
8. My co-workers son broke away from the BG's and ran up to a door and started beating on it.
9. The wife was dialing 911 while the BG was pulling her out of the truck.
10. The neighbor that had the gun and fired came out after hearing the commotion. He couldn't tell who the BG's were so he fired. He was prepared to fire at anyone who took aim at him.
11. The BG's heard the shots and tried fleeing in the truck, sideswiped a vehicle and took off. The chase started a little after that.

Now, I have discussed the possible scenarios if I would have been there. It would be difficult since there were 3 BG's with guns, there was no place to drive off and there were three other people in the truck with 3 armed BG's quickly approaching the cab. I assume the doors on the truck were unlocked (I always keep mine locked).
Alright, now let the what ifs start now that we have some more facts...
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by gigag04 »

Vic wrote:
seamusTX wrote:A neighbor came out armed and fired four shots.
What are the odds that the neighbor gets arrested, his guns confiscated, and has to spend thousands of dollars defending his freedom, and possibly never sees his firearm again?

I certainly do not say this to demean the neighbor. I firmly believe he did the right thing. It just seem that the good guys always get punished.

I've been reading lots of "aftermath" stories lately in which the CHL holder defends himself/herself or defends others and still goes to jail, and to court, and gets punished financially, even if they are no-billed by the grand jury, and then have enormous hassles getting their firearm back.

Maybe its just that the stories in which the good guy does not get punished are lackluster and don't get published...I hope so, anyway.

Which stories are these? Having the gun taken that was used in the incident is not a "loss of freedom" - it's a necessary part of investigation. We are not the US Army, and we cannot fire on people as soon as they meet the rules of engagement and keep on trucking. We are civilians under law - even LEOs - Every officer involved shooting step one is taking the officer's weapon.

As far as being charged with something...that is doubtful in this case as he has a very clear defense, if the story actually played out as the paper's portray it.

I just wish the guy was a better shot...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
boomerang
Senior Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by boomerang »

seamusTX wrote:A neighbor came out armed and fired four shots.
At what? And did the neighbor hit their target?
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by seamusTX »

boomerang wrote:
seamusTX wrote:A neighbor came out armed and fired four shots.
At what? And did the neighbor hit their target?
I don't know. Apparently no one was shot, and the police saw no immediate need to arrest the guy.

- Jim
mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by mrvmax »

seamusTX wrote:
boomerang wrote:
seamusTX wrote:A neighbor came out armed and fired four shots.
At what? And did the neighbor hit their target?
I don't know. Apparently no one was shot, and the police saw no immediate need to arrest the guy.

- Jim
The neighbor did not shoot at anything, he just fired to try and scare them away. I should have added to my previous post, the BG's picked them for the following. They looked like they had come back from hunting so they figured they would have guns and some money. They were targeted due to the ATV's they were hauling.
User avatar
boomerang
Senior Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by boomerang »

mrvmax wrote:The neighbor did not shoot at anything, he just fired to try and scare them away.
I disagree. He shot at something. It may have been the ground or a random unsafe direction, but the gun was pointed somewhere.

Maybe it's time to bump some of the old "warning shot" discussions.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by gigag04 »

boomerang wrote:Maybe it's time to bump some of the old "warning shot" discussions.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :leaving
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Outbreaker
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:15 pm

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by Outbreaker »

boomerang wrote:
mrvmax wrote:The neighbor did not shoot at anything, he just fired to try and scare them away.
I disagree. He shot at something. It may have been the ground or a random unsafe direction, but the gun was pointed somewhere.

Maybe it's time to bump some of the old "warning shot" discussions.
What's wrong with warning shots? I always fire a warning shot.

Granted it is a laser from a Crimson Trace grip......but it is a warning shot of where the real bullet is going...... :fire

"rlol"
chabouk
Banned
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:01 am

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by chabouk »

Outbreaker wrote: What's wrong with warning shots? I always fire a warning shot.
The first shot center mass should be a pretty good warning that if the BG doesn't stop, I'll shoot him again! :mrgreen:
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by seamusTX »

Let's try to keep in mind that the good guys all went home from this incident, the bad guys all went to jail, and nobody got hurt.

We should all be so fortunate when the balloon goes up.

- Jim
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by The Annoyed Man »

seamusTX wrote:Let's try to keep in mind that the good guys all went home from this incident, the bad guys all went to jail, and nobody got hurt.

We should all be so fortunate when the balloon goes up.

- Jim
Jim, that was a really interesting link. This is the part I found the most fascinating:
The hot word at the start of the allied bombing was decimate : our side's aircraft was hailed far and wide on the air and in print for "decimating the enemy air force." Walter Cronkite on CBS corrected a colleague's use of the verb, which means "reduce by one-tenth," originally Latin for "kill every tenth man as punishment for mutiny"; sloppy writers use it as a confused intensifier after using devastate , which hardly needs emphasis. In time, unless purists persist, decimate will come to mean "destroy a large part of."
I will never misuse that word again... ...unless I am punishing someone for mutiny!
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by seamusTX »

William Safire was a fascinating writer who lived through some fascinating times, R.I.P.

The word decimate is so commonly misused now that the battle is lost.

- Jim
User avatar
karder
Senior Member
Posts: 1380
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:14 pm
Location: El Paso

Re: Texas City: armed carjacking foiled

Post by karder »

casingpoint wrote:
My other defensive strategy is to drive a truck nobody would want to steal. :biggrinjester:
Ford man, huh? :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5:
Ha! Good call casingpoint! 1995 Ford Bronco. No one would steal her with today's gas prices! :lol:
“While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.” ― Samuel Adams
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”