TexasCHLforum.com

Mexican cartels cannot be defeated, drug lord says

Oh?

MadMonkey wrote:

Unfortunately, cockroaches can survive radiation.

casingpoint wrote:

Only two answers:
decriminalize drugs
Seal the borders and ports

WRONG! Add carpet bombing.

You beat me to it.

Fangs wrote:You left out land mines.

Seriously, put the death sentence on anyone caught with a smidgen of pot and see how much longer it's "cool" to smoke it. If you test positive for use in your system, you get 1 appeal (a retest) and then death. Quick, easy, basically flawless. Put a $1000 dollar reward on anyone who snitches someone out leading to a conviction.

That would just about solve the immigration problem, the gun smuggling problem, and finish up the war on drugs all in one neat package. Now I'll be the first to admit that very few people would have the stomach for it, but if they really wanted to win then this would be the way to go. IMHO

it would make every pot bust a fight to the death. If anything, it would increase the violence.
I'm not sure we need to make non-violent crime a capital offense.

LewisKram wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:

"Shoot low boys! They’re riding Shetland Ponies!” - ??

The above quote/book was by the late Lewis Grizzard.

Back on point:

Take the profit out and one problem goes away.

As for the addicts - get a rope!

Hows about we start with the people addicted to the opium of the masses.

Marx called "religion" the opiate of the masses. That is where the term came from. Are you suggesting that religious people be hung? So, you've got a post about whether or not an automatic weapon is practical for self defense, another post about whether or not it is possible to shoot the president, and now a third post about mass executions of the religious.

I'm thinking troll, maybe?

The Annoyed Man wrote:

LewisKram wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:

"Shoot low boys! They’re riding Shetland Ponies!” - ??

The above quote/book was by the late Lewis Grizzard.

Back on point:

Take the profit out and one problem goes away.

As for the addicts - get a rope!

Hows about we start with the people addicted to the opium of the masses.

Marx called "religion" the opiate of the masses. That is where the term came from. Are you suggesting that religious people be hung? So, you've got a post about whether or not an automatic weapon is practical for self defense, another post about whether or not it is possible to shoot the president, and now a third post about mass executions of the religious.

I'm thinking troll, maybe?

I think you are correct sir!
You might take note of his name spelled backwards.

MadMonkey wrote:

Mexican cartels cannot be defeated, drug lord says

Oh?

Unfortunately, this is no longer an option according to obimbo.

Oldgringo wrote:As for the addicts - get a rope!

Can you expound upon this?

Do you propose we do the same for those who drink excessive alcohol (4 to 5 drinks in one sitting)? Surely you don't believe Marijuana is any worse than alcohol?

Fangs wrote:You left out land mines.

Seriously, put the death sentence on anyone caught with a smidgen of pot and see how much longer it's "cool" to smoke it. If you test positive for use in your system, you get 1 appeal (a retest) and then death. Quick, easy, basically flawless. Put a $1000 dollar reward on anyone who snitches someone out leading to a conviction.

That would have to be state by state. Although the Constitution seems to give the feds the authority to outlaw drug imports, and to defend the borders against formal or informal invasion, there's nothing in there allowing the feds to regulate drug possession. Or gun possession for that matter.

Rex B wrote:Only two answers:
decriminalize drugs
Seal the borders and ports

I prefer the "Clear and Present Danger" approach.....

[Hows about we start with the people addicted to the opium of the masses.[/quote]
Marx called "religion" the opiate of the masses. That is where the term came from. Are you suggesting that religious people be hung? So, you've got a post about whether or not an automatic weapon is practical for self defense, another post about whether or not it is possible to shoot the president, and now a third post about mass executions of the religious.

I'm thinking troll, maybe?[/quote]

I think you are correct sir!
You might take note of his name spelled backwards.[/quote]

Good Eye, Cowboy!

Who needs him - backwards or frontwards?[/quote]


The troll was probably just someone taking advantage of one of our members, by the name and avatar they used.

Oldgringo wrote: Who needs him - backwards or frontwards?

cowboymd wrote:[Hows about we start with the people addicted to the opium of the masses.

Marx called "religion" the opiate of the masses. That is where the term came from. Are you suggesting that religious people be hung? So, you've got a post about whether or not an automatic weapon is practical for self defense, another post about whether or not it is possible to shoot the president, and now a third post about mass executions of the religious.

I'm thinking troll, maybe?[/quote]

I think you are correct sir!
You might take note of his name spelled backwards.[/quote]

Good Eye, Cowboy!

Who needs him - backwards or frontwards?[/quote]


The troll was probably just someone taking advantage of one of our members, by the name and avatar they used. [/quote]

Or not.

joe817 wrote:

cowboymd wrote:The troll was probably just someone taking advantage of one of our members, by the name and avatar they used.

Or not.

You may have a point. It looks like the banned person was not the first one in the thread to suggest hanging people.

williamkevin wrote:

Rex B wrote:Only two answers:
decriminalize drugs
Seal the borders and ports

I prefer the "Clear and Present Danger" approach.....

Like, guided bombs killing children at a birthday party because of the occupation chosen by the adults around them? That "Clear and Present Danger"?