Page 2 of 2

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:40 pm
by TLE2
Plastic guns don't kill plastic people, plastic people kill plastic people.

Actually, when you think about the absurdity of it, then a pencil, pen or other 'sharp' object violates the 'no weapons' policy.

These people are from the shallow end of the liberal gene pool.

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:54 pm
by Oldgringo
In large part, we can thank the government sponsored various teachers' unions for this, and other, education travesties.

Can you say TEA? Can you say NEA? Can you say VOTES?

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:24 am
by TexDotCom
Here is a silver lining, though:

http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/education/ ... gets-medal

"During an appearance on WPRO-AM on Friday, 8-year-old David Morales was given a medal called a challenge coin after a hat he made for a school project to honor American veterans and soldiers was banned from the school."

This is a must-read article that gave me a warm, fuzzy feeling because of how the kiddo was treated.

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:12 pm
by LarryH
AndyC wrote:"Zero-tolerance" is a crutch to avoid the responsibility and effort of having to think and come to a fair decision.
:iagree:

The only question is whether the administrators are unable to think or just unwilling.

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:12 pm
by seniorshooteress
all is well that ends well. The little guy got an award and was made to know that he did something good not something bad by making his hat to honor our military. Maybe the people who decided his hat wasn't appropriate are eating a bit of crow right now, I sure hope so. Made them look like fools. Goody, goody. Kudo's to the radio/tv show for airing this. :thumbs2:

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:05 pm
by TexDotCom
LarryH wrote:
AndyC wrote:"Zero-tolerance" is a crutch to avoid the responsibility and effort of having to think and come to a fair decision.
:iagree:

The only question is whether the administrators are unable to think or just unwilling.
Although I don't have a lot of faith that they put a lot of thought into anything, I really believe this litigious society in which we live and operate gives a lot of incentive for folks to create zero-tolerance policies and decisions out of an unwillingness to think & act critically. In spite of how ridiculous it makes them appear, at least they don't have to worry about being sued and having to back up their actions with reasoning and logical thought! :grumble :banghead:

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:51 pm
by Oldgringo
AndyC wrote:"Zero-tolerance" is a crutch to avoid the responsibility and effort of having to think and come to a fair decision.
Knowing who some of the "thinkers" are, or could be, makes me wonder but what "Zero-Tolerance" may be the best policy afterall?

Re: Boy's hat violates zero-tolerance weapons policy

Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:37 pm
by Deltaboy
Sad Day in America! :patriot: