After all, Cuellar is in town every other week or so, going on and on about how much money he secured from the XYZ fund, or ABC committee to make life better in Guadalupe County.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
If that is his campaign's consciously made decision, then I would feel better about it. I would hate to see it simply be something like lack of interest in campaigning.KD5NRH wrote:IMO, Perry would do better to wait about another month before pushing anyway; we've seen plenty of evidence of the short memory voters tend to have.
It's apparently both major markets in the State--I haven't seen a Perry ad in months here in Houston.The Annoyed Man wrote:I was merely curious about why Perry - who is after all pretty well funded himself - is allowing his only real challenger to run against him unopposed in one of the two largest political markets in the state.
IIRC, the best strategy is for a challenger to build name recognition well in advance, while an incumbent who already has the name recognition gets better results from a push right before early voting starts.The Annoyed Man wrote:If that is his campaign's consciously made decision, then I would feel better about it. I would hate to see it simply be something like lack of interest in campaigning.KD5NRH wrote:IMO, Perry would do better to wait about another month before pushing anyway; we've seen plenty of evidence of the short memory voters tend to have.
ExactlyThe Annoyed Man wrote:I know that White's reputation is tarnished by his performance as mayor of Houston, so I wonder if he's running all these ads in the next largest market where he hopes that people less individually familiar with his reputation might be swayed by the papp.
I had much the same thought, the first time I heard that ad.RHENRIKSEN wrote:All I know is that Bill White's newly announced plan to 'secure our border' was disgusting. He ran the fourth largest city in the country as a sanctuary city, and now he wants to 'secure the border'? Give me a break.