Page 2 of 2
Re: Violating a 30.06 Sign
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:23 pm
by jamisjockey
alphonso wrote:Thanks for all the replies folks.
I'm still wondering about an actual case of someone being prosecuted for violating a 30-06 sign...
I'm still wondering about cases of establishments with incorrect 30.06 signs being told they won't be frequented by CHL holders who don't mention the fact the sign is incorrect then researching the statute further and posting a correct sign.
Re: Violating a 30.06 Sign
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:49 pm
by ScottDLS
alphonso wrote:Thanks for all the replies folks.
I'm still wondering about an actual case of someone being prosecuted for violating a 30-06 sign...
So far, no one 'round here has been able to come up with a case. The closest was the Bedford Nurse's Aid that Wildbill posted.
Re: Violating a 30.06 Sign
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:30 pm
by alphonso
ScottDLS wrote:alphonso wrote:Thanks for all the replies folks.
I'm still wondering about an actual case of someone being prosecuted for violating a 30-06 sign...
So far, no one 'round here has been able to come up with a case. The closest was the Bedford Nurse's Aid that Wildbill posted.
That's been my take on it also.
I started this thread out of pure curiosity, not because I have any intention of violating a 30-06 sign.