Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:16 am
...NICE job!!!
TexasCHLforum.com
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Hammer or Hammerless?
Page 2 of 2
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Nice Bob Job. I've never missed the exposed hammer on my Centennial. I would much prefer a smoothed over DA pull vs. cocked revolver for defensive work - it doesn't take much excitement to generate potential for an AD...
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:29 pm
...for a stiff trigger on a gun I didn't want to pay to have smoothed...Gun Butter has made a lot of difference for me...I remove the sideplate and apply it sparingly at all contact surfaces...noticeable difference...only had to use it once...haven't a clue why it works well...
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:39 pm
that most likely I would never have the time to cock the hammer if the situation came up. I like the fact that without the hammer it is one less thing that could snag clothing
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:51 pm
One of our posters kindly gave me instructions on ordering replacement springs and do-it-yourself steps for my S&W 442. Replaced the trigger spring. Helped quite a bit.speedsix wrote:...for a stiff trigger on a gun I didn't want to pay to have smoothed.....
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:43 pm
personal preference, I want the hammer. For a carefully aimed shot, I want all the advantages available, and dropping the trigger pull 2-3 pounds has helped me make those tight snake shots I may have missed otherwise.