Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:51 pm
jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Elmo
TexasCHLforum.com
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Page 2 of 2
Elmo
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:56 pm
b322da wrote:jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Although it was interesting to learn that cocaine is legal. I guess its true that you learn something every day.
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:59 pm
This is not true. If an LEO saw some cocaine, he would "arrest" it and put it in "custody". So it must be illegal.Katygunnut wrote:b322da wrote:jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Although it was interesting to learn that cocaine is legal. I guess its true that you learn something every day.
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:21 pm
You guys just don't listen. It's not legal and it's not illegal. It is a controlled substance that is used for many legitimate purposes.Katygunnut wrote:b322da wrote:jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Although it was interesting to learn that cocaine is legal. I guess its true that you learn something every day.
The unauthorized use or possession of cocaine is illegal.
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:43 pm
The law sets MINIMUM standards for the purpose of proper notice. If the sign does not meet the minimum standards then it does not meet the law's definition of proper notice, short of someone verbally telling me or handing me written notification. IANAL, but the law seems pretty easy to understand as written.texas1234 wrote:...my credit union has a 30.06 that is not up to the actual code and I do not carry in that establishment. Its not worth it to me. I dont agree with it but its the law. I think in this case you are getting into symantecs and you will lose in court.
With this in mind I will likely respect intent to properly post even if it is not entirely within the tech spec.
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:29 pm
WildBill wrote:This is not true. If an LEO saw some cocaine, he would "arrest" it and put it in "custody". So it must be illegal.Katygunnut wrote:b322da wrote:jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Although it was interesting to learn that cocaine is legal. I guess its true that you learn something every day.
But only after it was x-rayed, groped, and consented to an illegal search.
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:23 am
WildBill wrote:This is not true. If an LEO saw some cocaine, he would "arrest" it and put it in "custody". So it must be illegal.Katygunnut wrote:b322da wrote:jmra wrote: ...Actually, with this thread, I think we are just having fun....
Elmo
Although it was interesting to learn that cocaine is legal. I guess its true that you learn something every day.
actually there are forms of cocaine that are perfectly legal with a prescription so if mr police officer arrests me for cocaine possession when it is in the original prescription container mr police officer is going to have as Ricky Ricardo would say some splainin to do
Re: Is This 30.06 Sign Legal??
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:11 am
Variables and terms
If a city had a sign ordinance regulating taxes paid and permits bought and displayed for various types of signs, and if that sign fit into the regulated category, and if they did not have the proper tax/permit fee paid and properly displayed permit sticker ... it "could" be an "illegal" sign.
I know a person who had garage sale signs too close to the road in Pasadena, without a sign permit, and they were "illegal signs" even though there was in fact a Garage sale there so they were "valid" signs.
However, concerning 30.06, that has nothing to do with whether it is either "enforceable", or if it contains the proper language and correct citations/language (not 29ee like OLD signs) or even if it has been spell-checked.
So, I suppose in some particular situation an "illegal" "valid" sign (in violation of a city sign ordinance, not having a city permit fee paid etc.) might even be "enforceable" IF it was 30.06 "compliant"
(That said, expect to see me use the incorrect terms a lot,[because I have] but you know what I mean )
solne01 ... welcome to the forum, don't let our craziness scare you off. Personally, I'd have to see the sign to decide for myself whether it was compliant or not.... granted, a judge's opinion may differ from mine, but I'd have to see the sign to try and see if I would be breaking a law (which I wouldn't do knowingly) or not.
If a city had a sign ordinance regulating taxes paid and permits bought and displayed for various types of signs, and if that sign fit into the regulated category, and if they did not have the proper tax/permit fee paid and properly displayed permit sticker ... it "could" be an "illegal" sign.
I know a person who had garage sale signs too close to the road in Pasadena, without a sign permit, and they were "illegal signs" even though there was in fact a Garage sale there so they were "valid" signs.
However, concerning 30.06, that has nothing to do with whether it is either "enforceable", or if it contains the proper language and correct citations/language (not 29ee like OLD signs) or even if it has been spell-checked.
So, I suppose in some particular situation an "illegal" "valid" sign (in violation of a city sign ordinance, not having a city permit fee paid etc.) might even be "enforceable" IF it was 30.06 "compliant"
(That said, expect to see me use the incorrect terms a lot,[because I have] but you know what I mean
)solne01 ... welcome to the forum, don't let our craziness scare you off. Personally, I'd have to see the sign to decide for myself whether it was compliant or not.... granted, a judge's opinion may differ from mine, but I'd have to see the sign to try and see if I would be breaking a law (which I wouldn't do knowingly) or not.