Page 2 of 2
Re: 2,564.8 miles per gallon
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:31 pm
by WildBill
Dave2 wrote:Oh as an exercise, yeah they're great -- for the reasons you listed and more. I was talking about the technologies.
Still, it's not bad work for a class project for some college students. A company like Ford has thousands of engineers, spends millions and millions of dollars, and takes three years - to change the body style of a car by rounding off some corners, changing the trim, and modifiying the headlights and turn signals.
Besides, this contest was sponsored by Shell. Do you think they want a car that gets 2,564 miles per gallon? Not unless they can charge $2,564.80 per gallon of gas.

Re: 2,564.8 miles per gallon
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:12 pm
by Ameer
WildBill wrote:Dave2 wrote:Oh as an exercise, yeah they're great -- for the reasons you listed and more. I was talking about the technologies.
Still, it's not bad work for a class project for some college students. A company like Ford has thousands of engineers, spends millions and millions of dollars, and takes three years - to change the body style of a car by rounding off some corners, changing the trim, and modifiying the headlights and turn signals.
I bet the college students didn't have liberal arts major middle management second guessing the engineers' technical decisions.
Plus they had non-union labor doing the work.

Re: 2,564.8 miles per gallon
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:15 pm
by WildBill
Ameer wrote:WildBill wrote:Dave2 wrote:Oh as an exercise, yeah they're great -- for the reasons you listed and more. I was talking about the technologies.
Still, it's not bad work for a class project for some college students. A company like Ford has thousands of engineers, spends millions and millions of dollars, and takes three years - to change the body style of a car by rounding off some corners, changing the trim, and modifiying the headlights and turn signals.
I bet the college students didn't have liberal arts major middle management second guessing the engineers' technical decisions.
Plus they had non-union labor doing the work.

That's why they were able to finish on-time and in budget. They didn't need weekly PowerPoint presentations to management.
