johnson0317 wrote:Jeff Barriault wrote:srothstein wrote:I find it interesting that you asked this because I am supposed to be writing a paper on a very similar topic right now. The paper is due Tuesday evening and is on the question of whether or not allowing citizens to possess or carry firearms will affect the crime rate. So far, I have found studies saying the crime rate goes up, goes down, and is not affected.
One of the best researchers on this topic is John Lott. You should check out his book More Guns, Less Crime.

I think he will prove your thesis wrong.
I have his study, and Gary Kleck's, as well as some by Duncan, Duggan, Donahue, and Cook. There really is quite a bit of scholarly work int his area and the evidence goes every possible way. And I could not believe how divisive the filed is academically when I started researching this. I know that the public is really divided over gun control, but I had thought the academic researchers would be a little less biased in their research. I was way wrong on that. The field is even worse in the journals than it is in the mass media if you understand how the academics attack each other.
And when I read the CDC summary of 51 studies, I found why they say the evidence is inconclusive. Many of the articles do even agree on definitions of terms or what is a good result, let alone agree on what the results of a study are.
So, I did come up with a plan to get good data. But it requires me to get the degree first because it would take at least ten years. And that depends on financing of several million dollars per year. The first step is to survey various organizations on both sides of the issue to get some idea of working definitions they can all agree on. That may be impossible right there since I am not sure that Josh Sugarmann and Wayne LaPierre would agree that the sky is blue.