And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bit of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.
ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
- Jumping Frog
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Jumping Frog wrote:And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bit of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.

(why?)
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
All over the interwebs
http://www.google.com/search?q=Feds+ban ... =firefox-a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Specifically:
Feds ban AK-47 look-alike
By Jessica Murphy ,Parliamentary Bureau
First posted: Thursday, January 05, 2012
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/01/05/f ... look-alike" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One Comment there was : "Who said the registry isn't about confiscation?"
more at link above
http://www.google.com/search?q=Feds+ban ... =firefox-a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Specifically:
Feds ban AK-47 look-alike
By Jessica Murphy ,Parliamentary Bureau
First posted: Thursday, January 05, 2012
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/01/05/f ... look-alike" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Learn from watching our neighbors ... both North and South.OTTAWA -- The federal government is cracking down on a small game rifle, saying it was inappropriately classified as a non-restricted weapon.
But one firearms activist argues it's an end run by federal bureaucrats related to a long-running court battle.
<Registered> Owners of the Armi Jager AP80 .22-calibre rifle received a letter from the RCMP in December saying the registration certificates for the firearm would be revoked and they had a month to dispose of their weapons - with no compensation.
As of Dec. 20, the once legally owned gun would be classified as prohibited.
The RCMP didn't respond to media requests by press time. The force oversees gun classification through the Canadian Firearms Program.
One Comment there was : "Who said the registry isn't about confiscation?"
more at link above
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
- Jumping Frog
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Not as common as it once was because suppressor designs have changed, but BATFE also ruled that since rubber washers were used as wipes in suppressors, having just the rubber washers meant illegal possession of suppressor parts. IIRC they ruled once that a person who owned a legally registered suppressor could not also possess the wipes, and then they reversed themselves on that decision too.Dave2 wrote:Jumping Frog wrote:And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .
(why?)

-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Because flat washers are great baffles for a homemade suppressor. I used thick flat washers to make my first one and they are pretty effective at both 9 mm and .22.Dave2 wrote:Jumping Frog wrote:And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bitC of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.
(why?)
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Remember that bump fire stock somebody made a few years ago? It wasn't a firearm, just a stock, so no need for any ATF ruling. But just to be safe he sent it to them anyway, they approved it said it was legal. He just got started selling them good a few months later and ATF changed their minds, made him destroy all his stock and give them his customer list so they could warn people they owned an illegal machine gun.
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
I think that was for the 10-22. The atkins accelerator was a bogus case as the trigger still fired one shot per pull. I can't believe it was never overturned.
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Still perfectly legit for AR-15 and AK-47: http://www.slidefiresolutions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Bullwhip wrote:Remember that bump fire stock somebody made a few years ago? It wasn't a firearm, just a stock, so no need for any ATF ruling. But just to be safe he sent it to them anyway, they approved it said it was legal. He just got started selling them good a few months later and ATF changed their minds, made him destroy all his stock and give them his customer list so they could warn people they owned an illegal machine gun.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
- Jumping Frog
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria
Until the ATF changes their mind again. . . and forces the manufacturer to scrap the entire value of their inventory.OldCannon wrote:Still perfectly legit for AR-15 and AK-47: http://www.slidefiresolutions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ