ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by Jumping Frog »

Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bit of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.
And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by Dave2 »

Jumping Frog wrote:
Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bit of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.
And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .
:smilelol5:

(why?)
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by RPB »

All over the interwebs
http://www.google.com/search?q=Feds+ban ... =firefox-a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Specifically:
Feds ban AK-47 look-alike
By Jessica Murphy ,Parliamentary Bureau
First posted: Thursday, January 05, 2012
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/01/05/f ... look-alike" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
OTTAWA -- The federal government is cracking down on a small game rifle, saying it was inappropriately classified as a non-restricted weapon.

But one firearms activist argues it's an end run by federal bureaucrats related to a long-running court battle.

<Registered> Owners of the Armi Jager AP80 .22-calibre rifle received a letter from the RCMP in December saying the registration certificates for the firearm would be revoked and they had a month to dispose of their weapons - with no compensation.

As of Dec. 20, the once legally owned gun would be classified as prohibited.

The RCMP didn't respond to media requests by press time. The force oversees gun classification through the Canadian Firearms Program.
Learn from watching our neighbors ... both North and South.

One Comment there was : "Who said the registry isn't about confiscation?"

more at link above
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by Jumping Frog »

Dave2 wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .
:smilelol5:

(why?)
Not as common as it once was because suppressor designs have changed, but BATFE also ruled that since rubber washers were used as wipes in suppressors, having just the rubber washers meant illegal possession of suppressor parts. IIRC they ruled once that a person who owned a legally registered suppressor could not also possess the wipes, and then they reversed themselves on that decision too. :confused5 Anyway, it is basically another example of BATFE idiocy.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
rm9792
Senior Member
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by rm9792 »

Dave2 wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
Dave2 wrote:In their eyes, probably, yeah. In fact, won't the ATF flat-out arrest you for walking around with a pistol-length upper in one hand and a regular lower in the other? By that logic anyone who's carrying a rifle with a fixed charging handle and has access a bitC of string — such as your example of the shoe lace — just needs to go to jail... forever... because they're terrorists.
And heaven help you if you have any rubber washers in your toolbox. . .
:smilelol5:

(why?)
Because flat washers are great baffles for a homemade suppressor. I used thick flat washers to make my first one and they are pretty effective at both 9 mm and .22.
Bullwhip
Senior Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:31 am

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by Bullwhip »

Remember that bump fire stock somebody made a few years ago? It wasn't a firearm, just a stock, so no need for any ATF ruling. But just to be safe he sent it to them anyway, they approved it said it was legal. He just got started selling them good a few months later and ATF changed their minds, made him destroy all his stock and give them his customer list so they could warn people they owned an illegal machine gun.
rm9792
Senior Member
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by rm9792 »

I think that was for the 10-22. The atkins accelerator was a bogus case as the trigger still fired one shot per pull. I can't believe it was never overturned.
User avatar
OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Kyle, TX

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by OldCannon »

Bullwhip wrote:Remember that bump fire stock somebody made a few years ago? It wasn't a firearm, just a stock, so no need for any ATF ruling. But just to be safe he sent it to them anyway, they approved it said it was legal. He just got started selling them good a few months later and ATF changed their minds, made him destroy all his stock and give them his customer list so they could warn people they owned an illegal machine gun.
Still perfectly legit for AR-15 and AK-47: http://www.slidefiresolutions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: ATF Idiocy: Gun makers baffled by ATF criteria

Post by Jumping Frog »

OldCannon wrote:Still perfectly legit for AR-15 and AK-47: http://www.slidefiresolutions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Until the ATF changes their mind again. . . and forces the manufacturer to scrap the entire value of their inventory.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”