TexasCHLforum.com

speedsix wrote:

WildBill wrote:

Keith B wrote:And he WAS arrested FOR brandishing a weapon. They CHARGED him with Assault with a Deadly Weapon, which is the statute he violated by brandishing.

Well said KeithB. But I should expect that from a man as old as you.

...yer just eggin' him on, WildBill...even by his own definition(and two other dictionaries I checked) the guy didn't brandish his gun...he pointed it right at them...no wavin', flourishin', or none of that such...he did just what the code says (maybe KeithB's from Virginia)...he exhibited it and used it...but neither in showing it while holstered...nor pointing it right at them...did he "brandish" it...

Jumping Frog wrote: Who knows what those guys were really doing at the rest stop. . .

Keith B wrote:

speedsix wrote:

WildBill wrote:

Keith B wrote:And he WAS arrested FOR brandishing a weapon. They CHARGED him with Assault with a Deadly Weapon, which is the statute he violated by brandishing.

Well said KeithB. But I should expect that from a man as old as you.

...yer just eggin' him on, WildBill...even by his own definition(and two other dictionaries I checked) the guy didn't brandish his gun...he pointed it right at them...no wavin', flourishin', or none of that such...he did just what the code says (maybe KeithB's from Virginia)...he exhibited it and used it...but neither in showing it while holstered...nor pointing it right at them...did he "brandish" it...

Sure he did. He pointed it at one person, then waved it over to another

And I really don't care what you want to call it, bottom line it is as you said, aggravated assault. And I am from Missouri, was a LEO there, brandished is used in the statutes http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c500-599/5710000107.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

strider67 wrote:

Jumping Frog wrote: Who knows what those guys were really doing at the rest stop. . .

Maybe, what did they do before they got to the rest stop, on the highway before stopping, perhaps...possibly some kind of road-rage thing that carried into the rest stop...

speedsix wrote:(I never would have guessed you were from the "SHOW me!!!" state)...you just love to get me stirred up, to see if I'm awake...or have some semblance of function left...

Fangs wrote:... like the XDs used to come with along with spare magazines.

Jumping Frog wrote:

strider67 wrote:

Jumping Frog wrote: Who knows what those guys were really doing at the rest stop. . .

Maybe, what did they do before they got to the rest stop, on the highway before stopping, perhaps...possibly some kind of road-rage thing that carried into the rest stop...

Yeah, what I failed to mention my first comment was my overall skepticism simply based on a long history of reading news accounts that are completely inaccurate and bear little if any resemblance to what actually happened. With "normal" news reporting, I am surprised they didn't refer to his handgun as an AK-47.

Heartland Patriot wrote:They only call LONG-guns AK-47s...any handgun is a Glock...such as Colt Peacemaker = Glock, 1911 = Glock, Luger = Glock...except, if it WERE actually a Glock...then its an "assault weapon with assault clips".

Bullwhip wrote:

Heartland Patriot wrote:They only call LONG-guns AK-47s...any handgun is a Glock...such as Colt Peacemaker = Glock, 1911 = Glock, Luger = Glock...except, if it WERE actually a Glock...then its an "assault weapon with assault clips".

Saw a news story the other day... "9mm Glock Luger".

n5wd wrote:

Fangs wrote:... like the XDs used to come with along with spare magazines.

Used to? Not getting out, lately? SA is offering three magazines, an OWB, and a magazine holder with some of their XD(m)'s.

Heartland Patriot wrote:They only call LONG-guns AK-47s...any handgun is a Glock...such as Colt Peacemaker = Glock, 1911 = Glock, Luger = Glock...except, if it WERE actually a Glock...then its an "assault weapon with assault clips".