Re: CHL shoots an extra one in the head for "effect"
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:34 pm
Sounds like the guy was "fruit loops" and is right where he deserves to be.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Even if he was given verbal notice, he was not justified shooting the man.Glock 23 wrote:No trespassing....no soliciting. Different signs, though legally, I don't know the difference.
hard to call that trespassing...especially if no verbal notice given first
Not justified in shooting him just for trespassing but maybe for trespassing plus threats. I haven't seen the video of the shooting so I don't have all the facts.WildBill wrote:Even if he was given verbal notice, he was not justified shooting the man.Glock 23 wrote:No trespassing....no soliciting. Different signs, though legally, I don't know the difference.
hard to call that trespassing...especially if no verbal notice given first
The shooting occurred in front of a house. There is no video.gringo pistolero wrote:Not justified in shooting him just for trespassing but maybe for trespassing plus threats. I haven't seen the video of the shooting so I don't have all the facts.WildBill wrote:Even if he was given verbal notice, he was not justified shooting the man.Glock 23 wrote:No trespassing....no soliciting. Different signs, though legally, I don't know the difference.
hard to call that trespassing...especially if no verbal notice given first
But the guy appears to have murdered the steak salesman.Every so often when tragedy strikes involving a gun, gun rights become popular in politics. The left talks about tackling gun violence, while the right-wing cling to their guns and Second Amendment. Taking away guns from people is not the answer, but passing common sense gun legislation does make sense to most Americans. The problem with guns and gun rights in politics is that with the NRA and the conservative agenda of fear working overtime, any talk about limiting access to firearms, even to those who might be mentality unstable, is a political non-starter.
recaffeination wrote:MEAT IS MURDER!
LWOP is much cheaper for tax payers than a death sentence.jocat54 wrote:C-dub wrote:I didn't say it. Some did. Maybe it was Ron White.
"You can't fix stupid", but you can lock them up for life when they do something like this.
Sorry, no lock up, tax payers have to pay for that.........execute them.
Anyone here want nutcases to have guns?The problem with guns and gun rights in politics is that with the NRA and the conservative agenda of fear working overtime, any talk about limiting access to firearms, even to those who might be mentality unstable, is a political non-starter.
baldeagle wrote:This part is pure baloney.Anyone here want nutcases to have guns?The problem with guns and gun rights in politics is that with the NRA and the conservative agenda of fear working overtime, any talk about limiting access to firearms, even to those who might be mentality unstable, is a political non-starter.
Yeah, I didn't think so. Maybe reporters should actually interview somebody who is a responsible gun owner. But then they'd distort the interview anyway, so what the hey.