TexasCHLforum.com

tallmike wrote:Would it be different if she was asking the officer to be sensitive of her religious requirements and she was a Christian?

Teamless wrote:There should not be a separate frisking or processing policy for one person over another, period.
If my hat comes off, your headdress comes off.
If my shoes come off, your sandals come off
If my belt comes off, your belt comes off

The only thing that can be considered, and this is ONLY to protect the police officer for lawsuits, is a female should frisk a female, so there is nothing said (or nothing should be said) about a man "feeling her up" or "getting his jollies"

As others have said "move them to a separate room", well, if you give them a separate (or closed) area for frisking/processing, I had darn well get one too.

Equality was pushed for a couple hundred years.
it took until 1865 for blacks (males) to be considered equal in the eyes of the court
It took until 1920 or so, for woman to get the right to vote, and be considered equal
it took until the mid 60's for more black equality
It took until the early 70's with the burning of the bra's protesting for women to be treated equally
(You can debate on another thread if the above are truly, or were truly, treated equally.)

And now people want to be treated UNEQUAL?

SQLGeek wrote:

tallmike wrote:Would it be different if she was asking the officer to be sensitive of her religious requirements and she was a Christian?

No.

Heartland Patriot wrote:

SQLGeek wrote:

tallmike wrote:Would it be different if she was asking the officer to be sensitive of her religious requirements and she was a Christian?

No.

If she was Christian and got frisked, you would never have even heard about this...