Venus Pax wrote:Skiprr, I'm not bashing you for this; I know you're the messenger... but it has always bothered me that a person between the ages of 18 & 21 can fight for their country and can be tried as an adult in court, but cannot purchase and consume an alcholic beverage or purchase a firearm without parental consent.
I'd never accuse you of bashing me. In fact, I had my "minority disabilities" legally removed when I was 17 so I could execute binding contracts and manage my family's affairs. I wouldn't hesitate to allow the 17-year-old me a handgun and ammunition. He may not be as wise as I am now, but he had a more agile mind, a better memory, and was a
lot better looking.
On the flip side, why is 50 "senior"? In IDPA, you have no choice: you're 50 or over, you're a senior shooter. AARP membership starts at 50. Hello-o. It's the "American Association of Retired Persons". Who can retire at 50?
At 50-something, I don't feel "senior" yet. But I wouldn't go back to 17, either.

Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the
Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring
HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member