TexasCHLforum.com

Posted: **Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:03 pm**

philip964 wrote:I'm sure it has been brought up, but Romney did not get the same number of votes as McCain. Its not that old white men are outnumbered its that they didn't vote this time. If they had all voted like they did in 2008, Romney would have won. They told the pollsters they favored Romney and were going to vote, but didn't.

Its not that the Dems cheated or that Latinos voted for Obama or that idiot Republicans said stupid things about rape and conception. Its that Republicans didn't come out and vote like they did for McCain.

Obama could have been beaten. But these McCain voters stayed at home.

I am totally puzzled as to why.

His war record?

Sara Palin?

Didn't Romney lose to McCain in 2008? If so, the Republicans ran a guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama last time.

Brilliant strategy!

Posted: **Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:20 pm**

That also happened to Reagan. He lost in 1976 to Ford, who lost to Carter and then in 1980 was the Republican party nominee. Biggest difference there is that he won in 1980, while Romney failed in 2012.

Posted: **Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:05 am**

smoothoperator wrote:Statistically, women control more personal wealth than men, but don't let the facts upset your dogma.

Is "Old White Women" better?

Jim

TexasCHLforum.com

What is it about "ILLEGAL" they don't understand?

Re: What is it about "ILLEGAL" they don't understand?

Re: What is it about "ILLEGAL" they don't understand?

Re: What is it about "ILLEGAL" they don't understand?