TexasCHLforum.com

casselthief wrote:Klink rules! nicely done!

Sargent Shultz my good man! But nicely done.

Seems to me you were notified by the homeowner that she did not want you carrying her house, same as a 30.06 sign.

Jacob Staff wrote:Seems to me you were notified by the homeowner that she did not want you carrying her house, same as a 30.06 sign.

It was his cousin's house, and the GF simply lives there.

Even if she was not the home owner wouldn't she have the same rights since she lives there. Just because they are not the owner doesnt mean they dont have a say in it. If someone is living at your house, wether it is a friend or relative you can't just say hey get out of my house and expect them to if they don't want to go. I had someone who was a guest at my house for a couple of days and one night they stepped over the line so I asked them to leave which they didn't so after calling the cops to remove them I was told since they had been there more than a day I would have to file an eviction notice because "they had a right to be there". Makes no sense to me at all. Then again this did happen in Commiefornia, maybe its different here.

I think if i was in Glock's shoes I would have done the same though.

killerquad wrote:Even if she was not the home owner wouldn't she have the same rights since she lives there. Just because they are not the owner doesnt mean they dont have a say in it. If someone is living at your house, wether it is a friend or relative you can't just say hey get out of my house and expect them to if they don't want to go. I had someone who was a guest at my house for a couple of days and one night they stepped over the line so I asked them to leave which they didn't so after calling the cops to remove them I was told since they had been there more than a day I would have to file an eviction notice because "they had a right to be there". Makes no sense to me at all. Then again this did happen in Commiefornia, maybe its different here.

I think if i was in Glock's shoes I would have done the same though.

The property rights only belong to the owner of the property. Unless the BF specifically delegated such "authority" to her, her request means nothing in the eyes of the law.

killerquad wrote:Just because they are not the owner doesnt mean they dont have a say in it.

Then again this did happen in Commiefornia, maybe its different here.

You got that right...

Yet another reason why I am glad I chose to move here.

Like they say I wasn't born in TX but I got here as soon as I could.