Page 2 of 2

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 8:49 am
by Sport Coach
Stated nicely regarding other very human events: “Airbags were introduced in automobiles in the early 1990s, not to make driving safer but to make crashing safer. That’s an important distinction, because instead of starting from the assumption that we could do better as drivers, it was decided that we could not. We were not teachable. We would simply keep crashing no matter what. So we had to be protected – passively, as it were – during those crashes.” – Laurence Gonzales, Everyday Survival, Why Smart People Do Stupid Things

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:56 pm
by TheDude
Gordie Howe wrote:I am in favor of the Ruger semiauto design, where the gun doesnt fire, when the magazine is removed, even when a round is in the chamber.

That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced.
I took mine out of my Ruger SR9c. What if your mag gets released in a fight? Being able to at least fire the round in the chamber could save your life. If you follow the 4 safety rules you don't need a mag safety or really any safety. Some exceptions being a drop safety or a thumb safety on a 1911. You should never trust a mechanical safety anyway. They can and do fail.

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:39 pm
by Z0Tex
It just blows my mind that people can have an ND when they are cleaning or examining a gun. How hard is it to remember to check, unload, and double-check a gun before cleaning it or showing it to a friend?!

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:13 pm
by Abraham
"That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced"

I'll add my "No Thanks" to this idea.

I WANT my pistol to fire if the magazine is out.

When it comes to guns, the word "mandatory" sounds a bit hoplophobic...

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:36 pm
by K.Mooneyham
I own a Ruger SR9c. I have not taken the magazine disconnect safety out. However, I didn't buy it because it has one of those, either. I bought it because it fits my hand well and seems to feed pretty much everything I have put through it and I've had a good run with Ruger products. I would have been just as happy with it had it not had the magazine disconnect in it. The only reason I haven't pulled it out, I guess, is because I've never taken it that far apart before, just down to the major sub-assemblies. It cleans pretty easily without disassembling it completely. If I had to disassemble it all the way, I might leave it out when I put it back together. I think a magazine disconnect is kind of of something that's really not necessary.

Re: People that get complacent with firearms

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:42 pm
by SwimFan85
Gordie Howe wrote:I am in favor of the Ruger semiauto design, where the gun doesnt fire, when the magazine is removed, even when a round is in the chamber.

That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced.
I think it should be mandatory for people who want to impose dangerous things on me for "my safety" to be held under water for at least one hour after the bubbles stop.

For their safety. :reddevil