TexasCHLforum.com

These guys in these videos give firearms owners a bad name. Kudos to the the officers. I really don't know how they kept their cool. I probably would have been fired for conduct unbecoming of an officer. Like coming unglued and sticking my shoe up their rears.

pcgizzmo wrote:These guys in these videos give firearms owners a bad name. Kudos to the the officers. I really don't know how they kept their cool. I probably would have been fired for conduct unbecoming of an officer. Like coming unglued and sticking my shoe up their rears.

Those guys were such immature num nuts. I feel sorry for the officers having to deal with their nonsense.

Great job officer!

I particularly like how he didn't seem to understand the officer was in his right to allow him to hold the automatic weapon, in that it didn't mean possession. HEH, I wanted to see him highlight the fire selector.

I didn't think they carried select fire rifles, always thought they were semi's.

Attention seeking low brows - they're everywhere.

The question is, why did the three dorks feel compelled to test what liberties and freedom they have left?? Fortunately,the Cop was cool as a cucumber and didn't take the bait. kudos! Here's the problem. The media, along with the DHS promote vigilantism with their "see something say something" campaign which was likely taken from the Nazi Gestapo hand book. There is even a phone app to make spying on each other more convenient. What happened to the land of the free and home of the brave?

I think our rights must be carefully guarded and any attempt to reduce those rights must be fought. However, as members of society we also have obligations to those around us. Walking around with an AR on your back, even when legal, is certainly going to cause concern.

The activists, in this case, were wrong to do as they did.