Page 2 of 2
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:11 pm
by APynckel
Please don't give them any more ideas.
I TOLD YOU NOT TO GIVE THEM IDEAS!!
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/gun-laws/ ... gunpowder/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SIGH
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:30 am
by VMI77
brainman wrote:alvins wrote:they had a whole shelf of tannerite at academy. whats the difference.
The difference is back-door gun control. If a background check is required for powder, and one can empty out all ammunition and get all the powder you want, then it stands to reason that we'll need background checks and controlled access to ammo. Boom. Gun control. Common sense measures and all that.
With purchase limits, like we have for cold medicine.
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:36 am
by EconDoc
If they can control access to ammunition and reloading supplies, then they can shut them off. With no ammo and no way to reload, our guns become nothing but funny-looking clubs. It is all about turning us into peasants, serfs, and slaves while giving us the illusion that we are still free citizens. The process is much further along than most of us want to believe.
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:39 am
by sjfcontrol
They're saying today, that the bombs were made out of powder from fireworks.
So I suppose now we'll need a background check to buy firecrackers.
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:42 am
by APynckel
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:54 am
by TheCytochromeC
[/quote]With purchase limits, like we have for cold medicine.[/quote]
The current state of the arms market is already there, only difference is for how long the limit would last...
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:29 am
by talltex
This morning, Williams-Sonoma stores in Massachusetts announced they were pulling there "pressure cookers" off their shelves....I'm sure everyone feels SOOOO much safer now... I'm simply amazed that anyone can not look at all the factors involved in terrorist attacks...here and abroad...and fail to grasp that the problem lies with the individuals perpetrating the attacks and NOT the random physical components they utilize.
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:55 am
by VMI77
talltex wrote:This morning, Williams-Sonoma stores in Massachusetts announced they were pulling there "pressure cookers" off their shelves....I'm sure everyone feels SOOOO much safer now... I'm simply amazed that anyone can not look at all the factors involved in terrorist attacks...here and abroad...and fail to grasp that the problem lies with the individuals perpetrating the attacks and NOT the random physical components they utilize.
Yeah, because there's no way anybody could possibly figure out how to make a device that increases blast pressure if pressure cookers aren't available.
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:19 am
by SQLGeek
I guess Home Depot and Lowes better pull all of their metal pipes off the rack too. Good grief.
