One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

RHenriksen
Senior Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: Houston

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by RHenriksen »

JALLEN wrote:It seemed like no officers appeared in the yard for several minutes afterwards. I wonder why?
A couple of possible explanations leap to mind:

a) not wanting to be surprised by a second attacker, like they were by BMW guy
b) giving the BG time to bleed out...
I'll quit carrying a gun when they make murder and armed robbery illegal

Houston Technology Consulting
soup-to-nuts IT infrastructure design, deployment, and support for SMBs
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by Beiruty »

RHenriksen wrote:
JALLEN wrote:It seemed like no officers appeared in the yard for several minutes afterwards. I wonder why?
A couple of possible explanations leap to mind:

a) not wanting to be surprised by a second attacker, like they were by BMW guy
b) giving the BG time to bleed out...
b) above.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Beiruty wrote:
RHenriksen wrote:
JALLEN wrote:It seemed like no officers appeared in the yard for several minutes afterwards. I wonder why?
A couple of possible explanations leap to mind:

a) not wanting to be surprised by a second attacker, like they were by BMW guy
b) giving the BG time to bleed out...
b) above.
LAPD had to defend an expensive lawsuit for letting Emil Mătăsăreanu do exactly that after the North Hollywood Bank of America shoot out. That all of the available EMS units were tied up rendering care to Mătăsăreanu's and Larry Phillip Jr's many gunshot victims did not deter Mătăsăreanu's evil wench of a mother (who lived literally right around the corner from us at the time) from filing a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of his offspring because he bled out before LAPD SWAT would allow EMS to even enter what they called the "hot zone."

BTW, it was THIS shootout that led to California's passing of a 10 round magazine limit for all semiautomatic firearms. The inventory of the weaponry and the number of rounds fired follows (SOURCE):
  1. A Bushmaster Dissipator AR-15 illegally converted to fire full auto, with two 100-round Beta Magazines
  2. two Norinco Type 56 S rifles (AK variants), illegally purchased by Phillips which he illegally modifed to shoot full auto
  3. A Norinco Type 56 S-1 (AK variant) illegally modified to shoot full auto
  4. Several 75 to 100-round drum magazines, as well as 30 round box magazines for the AKs
  5. A semiautomatic HK-91 rifle (7.62 NATO) with several 30-round magazines,
  6. a Beretta 92FS Inox with several magazines.
Against this, responding officers were armed with their Beretta 92 sidearms, and one had a shotgun. The above linked Wiki article makes no mention of it, but a nearby gunstore eventually loaned out a couple of AR15s to the first squad cars that showed up, before the SWAT team got there, armed with their own AR15s.
  1. Approximately 1,100 rounds fired by Phillips and Mătăsăreanu, including between 60 and 120 rounds fired from the HK91—a full on .308 battle rifle :shock:
  2. Approximately 650 rounds were fired by police.
Phillips "legally" purchased two of the AKs, but the purchases were actually illegal because he was already a convicted felon at the time. California did not at the time, and so far as I know still does not, use the NICS system....performing their own background checks instead. The additional time required for a background check is supposed to make the process more thorough—one of the libtards' justifications for not using NICS instead—but that is obviously hogwash as he successfully made the purchases. But the stupidity doesn't stop there.......

These guys were "pros" and this was not their first armed heist:
  • On July 20, 1993 they robbed an armored car in Littleton, Colorado.
  • In October 1993, they were arrested in Glendale, California, for speeding. After Phillips surrendered with a concealed weapon, police found two semi-automatic rifles, two handguns, over 1,600 rounds of 7.62×39mm ammo, 1,200 rounds of 9mm and .45 ACP ammo, radio scanners, smoke bombs, IEDs, body armor vests, and three different California licence plates. They were Initially charged with conspiracy to commit robbery. They both served one hundred days in jail and were placed on three years' probation. Upon their release,most of their seized property was returned to them.
  • On June 14, 1995, they ambushed a Brinks armored car, killing one of the guards during the robbery.
  • In May 1996, they robbed two B of A branches in the San Fernando Valley, getting away with approximately $1.5 million.
  • By then, Phillips and Mătăsăreanu were known to law enforcement as the "High Incident Bandits" because of the types of weaponry they had used in three robberies before the North Hollywood shootout.
What we have here is not just a couple of clearly dangerous predators with absolutely no respect for ANY gun-control laws, but also a SERIOUS failure to communicate between various agencies of the state's government. WHOSE brilliant idea was it to return their rifles and ammo to two CONVICTED FELONS after they were released from jail? How on God's green earth did California's vaunted background check system allow—with a then 15 day long waiting period—a convicted felon with a long history of robbing banks and armored cars, and of committing murder during such robberies, to go ahead and take possession of two more AKs purchased from a gunstore?

There is are several lessons and some fallout after this shootout:
  1. Background checks with waiting periods don't work.
  2. Why do they not work? Because felons don't care about background checks and waiting periods, and they will still try to buy guns over the counter as well as obtaining them on the black market.
  3. Either way, they're going to get their hands on guns, and no LAW is going to stop them.
  4. Sometimes, they actually get away with breaking the law when they attempt to buy guns over the counter because all the layers of bureaucracy created by the law serve only to further clog up the system (and other times they get away with it because Eric Holder actually encourages the sale).
  5. California subsequently passed a magazine ban for mags over 10 rounds capacity, but existing mags were grandfathered, so Phillips and Mătăsăreanu would have still been able to procure those Beta mags and the 30 round mags if they had not already had them......ONE reason we know that magazine capacity limits won't work.
  6. We know for a certain and proven fact that the Phillips and Mătăsăreanus of the world don't give a snap for such laws, and the only people these laws actually hinder are the law-abiding.
  7. It was VERY shortly after the North Hollywood shootout that police departments nationwide started issuing AR15 patrol rifles to their line officers as a matter of course. Prior to then, typically only SWAT departments used them with any degree of regularly. Now they are as common in any squad car as the ubiquitous pump action 12 gauge shotgun.
I realize that all some this is tangential at best to the OP, but there are two similarities:
  1. Law breakers already in possession of firearms; and
  2. Bad guy down and bleeding out because police understandably feel no particular compulsion to render immediate aid to a guy who was just trying to kill them, and who in fact had actually shot them.
BTW, did anyone notice that the officer who was to the shooter's right, and who dodged away further to the shooter's right after being shot in the stomach, actually discharged a couple of rounds directly into the ground between himself and the other officer in black clothing? It looks like a variation on something that a Pasadena cop once told me—that it is fairly common for the first shot fired by a cop in a shooting to actually be fired from the low-ready as they are raising their weapon, causing the first round to go low into the ground before getting a shot of into the bad guy. With the officer in the video, he must have been reflexively pulling the trigger after he got hit, without watching where his shots were going. It's an understandable but regrettable reaction, and it could have easily resulted in a blue on blue shooting as it looked like the officer in black was still in the line of fire relative to the other officer.

.....all over drugs.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by JALLEN »

All over drugs?

The bank shoot-em-up you recount at length was just over money. Maybe we should just redefine bank robbery as a premature withdrawal or something, and let 'em go. The banks have plenty of money, and they don't.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
RHenriksen
Senior Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: Houston

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by RHenriksen »

And just marijuana, too. A plant. Not crystal meth, not PCP, etc.

I hate Colorado's recent gun laws, but agree with them on ending prohibition. .
I'll quit carrying a gun when they make murder and armed robbery illegal

Houston Technology Consulting
soup-to-nuts IT infrastructure design, deployment, and support for SMBs
texanjoker

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by texanjoker »

Beiruty wrote:
RHenriksen wrote:
JALLEN wrote:It seemed like no officers appeared in the yard for several minutes afterwards. I wonder why?
A couple of possible explanations leap to mind:

a) not wanting to be surprised by a second attacker, like they were by BMW guy
b) giving the BG time to bleed out...
b) above.
I would be checking on my partner before i broke cover on an armed wacko. I would want a good visual from another angle before i moved in.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by The Annoyed Man »

JALLEN wrote:All over drugs?

The bank shoot-em-up you recount at length was just over money. Maybe we should just redefine bank robbery as a premature withdrawal or something, and let 'em go. The banks have plenty of money, and they don't.
JALLEN, I meant that the shootout in the OP was over drugs. Obviously the bank shootout was over money.

BTW, I actually heard part of the NoHo shoothout taking place. I worked for a legal publisher at the time (you should remember this publication as a lawyer yourself) called Daily Journal Corporation, where I laid out the Los Angeles Daily Journal legal paper and several other law/real estate publications. Part of my responsibilities included interfacing with the software company that wrote the pagination software we used, whose offices were in NoHo. All the software developers were former DJ employees. I was on the phone with the lead developer over some issue or other, and I heard a whole lot of sirens and what sounded like firecrackers in the background. He told me that a bunch of police cars just rushed to a stop and there was some kind of crazy action going on across the street and down the block.

Later, the printing company I worked for (that brought me to Texas) was located in North Hollywood, and I used to deposit my paychecks at that B of A and then grab a sammich across the street at a Subway shop. This was about 3 years later, and the bank walls and the parking lot walls around parking lot were all still bullet pock-marked, although they had been painted over in an attempt to freshen up things a bit. One day I had to park 2 or 3 blocks down the side street before getting a sammich because there wasn't any other parking available. When I got out of my car, I realized that I was parked right next to the spot where Phillips blew his own brains out.

Anyway, I didn't mean to hijack the thread. Sorry about that.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
bizarrenormality

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by bizarrenormality »

JALLEN wrote:The bank shoot-em-up you recount at length was just over money. Maybe we should just redefine bank robbery as a premature withdrawal or something, and let 'em go. The banks have plenty of money, and they don't.
Do they have to be "undocumented workers" to get the benefit of that redefinition? Or do "undocumented pharmacists" and "urban youth organization" members qualify too?
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by JALLEN »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
JALLEN wrote:All over drugs?

The bank shoot-em-up you recount at length was just over money. Maybe we should just redefine bank robbery as a premature withdrawal or something, and let 'em go. The banks have plenty of money, and they don't.
JALLEN, I meant that the shootout in the OP was over drugs. Obviously the bank shootout was over money.
Charlie Munger's outfit. Sure. I used to run foreclosure notices and such stuff, and now they publish the State Bar Journal as well. Down right prosperous outfit, I hear.

I looked at your closing comment, "all over drugs" as intended to suggest that a big to-do over something so trivial that ought to be legal anyway is a gross overreaction. I don't feel that way at all. Society has gone down the slippery slope of squalor and degradation far enough, too far for my taste, actually, and this would be one more indicia.

When you have gotten to be an old grump, things look different than before. It's easier to see the error of your ways, and their ways, too.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by JALLEN »

jmra wrote: I was going off the linked story:
"Miami-Dade Detective John Saavedra was shot three times in the stomach, but was treated and released from the hospital."
Who knows. I do know that you don't get 3 penetrating gun shot wounds to the stomach and get "treated and released".
Here's more:
MIAMI (CBSMiami) – A Miami-Dade police detective shot three times in the line of duty is traveling to Washington D.C. Friday to receive a special award as a result of the shooting.

Det. John Saavedra’s trip comes as a bond hearing for Luis Estevanell, the man accused of helping to run the Miami grow house where the shooting took place, continues in a Miami-Dade courtroom.

In court the officers said they felt their lives were in danger when the home owner, Gerard Delgado, pulled a gun on them. An undercover Miami-Dade officer testified about the fatal shot he fired at Delgado’s head.

“I fired one shot from behind my vehicle,” he said. “When I fired the weapon he went down, I didn’t know if I had killed him or not.”

WEB VIDEO EXTRA BELOW: WARNING GRAPHIC VIDEO AND AUDIO: POLICE SHOOTOUT SURVEILLANCE VIDEO

Before going down, Delgado shot Miami-Dade police Officer John Saavedra three times below his bullet-proof vest.

Estevanell survived the intense close-range shootout with police, his 911 call during the incident was heard for the first time in court on Friday.

“There’s been a shooting, there’s been a shooting,” said Estevanell to a Miami-dade dispatcher. “They say they’re the police and they’re not the police. They just shot my friend.”

The gun fight from July 2012 was caught on video and shows Estevanell talking to police who didn’t realize that the homeowner Gerard Delgado was sitting in a BMW with dark-tinted windows in the driveway of the home near Coral Way and SW 60th Court.

Suddenly, Delgado jumps out of the car with a gun drawn and fires at the officers.

Det. Saavedra was shot three times under his bullet-proof vest.

Delgado was also shot and killed while trying to hide behind a tree in the middle of the driveway.

Police later found 80 pounds of marijuana worth $90,000 inside the home.

Estevanell, who did not fire any shots, is charged with possession of cocaine, trafficking in marijuana and second-degree felony murder. In Florida, anyone who commits a felony in which a death occurs can be held responsible for murder.

Saavedra, a former Miami-Dade PBA Officer of the Year, told CBS4’s that it shows how dangerous the job can be. He said he has a bullet inside him that may be with him for the rest of his life.

“I’m doing better,” he said. “But I am still in pain.”

Saavedra said two bullets entered his stomach and another struck him in his left leg.

On Friday Saavedra was in Washington, D.C. to receive an award from the National Association of Police Organizations as a result of this incident.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/05/10/mi ... ive-award/

Somewhere I thought I read the perp was using a Colt .380, and now I cannot find that. Anyone know?
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by jmra »

Thanks for the clarification. Obviously the first article was wrong about him being treated and released.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
surprise_i'm_armed
Senior Member
Posts: 4624
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:16 am
Location: Shady Shores, Denton County. On the shores of Lake Lewisville. John Wayne filmed here.

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by surprise_i'm_armed »

JALLEN:

Regarding your question asking if the BG had a Colt .380, I re-read all the above comments, where that gun was
mentioned. But with all the quotes and re-quotes, I'm not sure who the first forum member was, that stated that.

As a prosperous (although illegal) weed grower, the BG's choice of weapon was good on brand (Colt) but not so great
on caliber (.380). It seems he'd have enough money to move upmarket in his caliber and round count.

**************************************************************************************************************************************************
Didn't it seem that the number of LEO's raiding this grow house was quite small?

I'm used to seeing LEO teams with many more officers on the raiding team.

*************************************************************************************************************************************************
As to why the BG opened fire on the officers: His friend did not believe that they were real LEO's.

Many home invasions have been done by fake LEO's - maybe the BG's seriously believed the real LEO's were fake LEO's.

SIA
N. Texas LTC's hold 3 breakfasts each month. All are 800 AM. OC is fine.
2nd Saturdays: Rudy's BBQ, N. Dallas Pkwy, N.bound, N. of Main St., Frisco.
3rd Saturdays: Golden Corral, 465 E. I-20, Collins St exit, Arlington.
4th Saturdays: Sunny St. Cafe, off I-20, Exit 415, Mikus Rd, Willow Park.
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by JALLEN »

surprise_i'm_armed wrote:JALLEN:

Regarding your question asking if the BG had a Colt .380, I re-read all the above comments, where that gun was
mentioned. But with all the quotes and re-quotes, I'm not sure who the first forum member was, that stated that.

As a prosperous (although illegal) weed grower, the BG's choice of weapon was good on brand (Colt) but not so great
on caliber (.380). It seems he'd have enough money to move upmarket in his caliber and round count.
It was I, actually, and I am sure I read it in one or another of the stories I reviewed, each with a slightly different write-up, but danged if I can find it now. It might have been stated that way, and who knows if it was true? When is the last time a reporter got it right on stories like this, when all firearms are either high capacity Glocks or AK-47 machine guns.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by jmra »

JALLEN wrote:
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:JALLEN:

Regarding your question asking if the BG had a Colt .380, I re-read all the above comments, where that gun was
mentioned. But with all the quotes and re-quotes, I'm not sure who the first forum member was, that stated that.

As a prosperous (although illegal) weed grower, the BG's choice of weapon was good on brand (Colt) but not so great
on caliber (.380). It seems he'd have enough money to move upmarket in his caliber and round count.
It was I, actually, and I am sure I read it in one or another of the stories I reviewed, each with a slightly different write-up, but danged if I can find it now. It might have been stated that way, and who knows if it was true? When is the last time a reporter got it right on stories like this, when all firearms are either high capacity Glocks or AK-47 machine guns.
Watched the video again - looks like the BG has a fairly small firearm. Assume it was pocket carried (BGs don't usually carry in holsters).
If it was a pocket carry .380 he couldn't have had very many rounds. Tried to count the number of times he fired. Hard to tell if he fired before he was hit. Almost seems like he couldn't make up his mind who to shoot at. Looks like the officer closest to the house hit the BG maybe twice before the BG fired at him. BG looks to be a good shot (3 hits). Hard to tell how many total rounds BG fired.
I wonder if BG was high or something. He takes on 3 guys wearing vests while having very limited ammo. Hopefully he had yet to reproduce.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: One shot and one kill, maybe not..

Post by The Annoyed Man »

JALLEN wrote:Charlie Munger's outfit. Sure. I used to run foreclosure notices and such stuff, and now they publish the State Bar Journal as well. Down right prosperous outfit, I hear.
VERY prosperous, but not on paper, and deliberately so. It is also "publicly traded," but it isn't. The list of shareholders is a very small good-old-boys club of the powerful and politically well-connected; and the shares don't move, except between the people on that list. The company is maintained primarily as a tax shelter for its shareholders; hence the lack of on-paper profitability.

My boss there was the CEO, Jerry Salzman. He is Munger's hatchet man. Munger is Warren Buffet's hatchet man. As a department manager, I received Salzman's memo one year that there would be no "cost of living increases," and that if we wanted to recommend one of our employees for a salary increase, we would have to write a full report justifying the increase......at the same time of year that we had our month end reports for September and our fiscal year-end reports due. Salzman LOVES him some reports. Each of these is many pages long, with supporting charts, graphs, and other documents, and—as Arlo Guthrie phrased it—"circles and arrows, and a paragraph on the back of each one." We managers already were putting in 12-16 hour days. Naturally, VERY few reports recommending raises ever got written. That same year, Jerry Salzman received a salary upgrade from $280K/year to $1.5 million/year. As the CEO, his salary were listed on the SEC mandated annual prospectus, so that nice little raise he got did not remain secret from the employees for long—many of whom made it a point to scarf up a photocopy of the prospectus for their own edification each year. I was the guy who ordered the printing of them, so I had a nice shiny 4-color copy of my own. I made $35K that year (1999), plus a $4K bonus.....which they tried to take away from me after having already granted it to me. I had made some financial decisions based on that bonus, and so I made a stink about the way they were handling it, and I got to keep it. They retaliated by taking me off of salary and putting me on the time clock, and then forbidding any overtime, while still expecting the same level of output. It wasn't just me who was unhappy.

Company-wide morale was affected accordingly by their wage policies. The office employees were, ethnically, overwhelmingly Filipino, and the press room employees were mostly black. ALL of them were excellent and conscientious workers; and (from a C-level executive's POV) they were nice and docile, and had bought hook, line, and sinker, into the corporate culture's notion that their work efforts had no value. They mostly stuck around, but after 9 years of having sunk my financial future into building a career arc there, I exercised my capitalist option and got the hades out of there and never looked back. Daily Journal Corporation is a snake pit with a corporate culture of abuse and intimidation. I would experience significant levels of schadenfreude if they were to go out of business.

Other than that, I remember those years fondly. :cool:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”