Page 2 of 2

Re: Homeowners may be charged in MA for interfering with hun

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:02 pm
by Deltaboy
Mass is a Northern state with different world views than us.

Re: Homeowners may be charged in MA for interfering with hun

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:41 am
by jmra
Deltaboy wrote:Mass is a Northern state with different world views than us.
:iagree: I could never cohabitate with Yankees.

Re: Homeowners may be charged in MA for interfering with hun

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:55 pm
by JSThane
jmra wrote:
Deltaboy wrote:Mass is a Northern state with different world views than us.
:iagree: I could never cohabitate with Yankees.
I thought that too, until I met my wife, who is from that part of the country. Not all Yankees are liberals. I jokingly call her a "reformed Yankee," but the truth is, she was "reformed" long before I met her; for our first date, she asked to go to the range. :tiphat:

Re: Homeowners may be charged in MA for interfering with hun

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:57 pm
by jmra
JSThane wrote:
jmra wrote:
Deltaboy wrote:Mass is a Northern state with different world views than us.
:iagree: I could never cohabitate with Yankees.
I thought that too, until I met my wife, who is from that part of the country. Not all Yankees are liberals. I jokingly call her a "reformed Yankee," but the truth is, she was "reformed" long before I met her; for our first date, she asked to go to the range. :tiphat:
That's what we call a convert. Once converted they ain't Yankees no more. :mrgreen:

Re: Homeowners may be charged in MA for interfering with hun

Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:00 am
by The Annoyed Man
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Note also from the article hunting is NOT permitted there.
Hunting is not permitted on the land, but it had not been posted with “no hunting” signs.
Kind of like trying to charge a CHL holder with criminal trespass when you didn't post a 30.06 sign......