The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
I had a similar experience in my CHL class but still spent the next few months referring to the CHL-16 document to make sure I was clear on it. I still refer to it when I am going someplace unusual and want to make sure.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
That's all fine and dandy, but there was a ton of material in the class and while it is admirable that you remember that, it is not reasonable to expect that everyone would, or that every instructor would cover it that intensely.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
Pawpaw wrote:I'm glad we could help. This is a great bunch of people with a wealth of knowledge. Any questions you have, just ask them here. Your question will get answered from many different angles, just like it did here.
Welcome aboard and don't be a stranger!
I seldom expect as much from the many as I do from the few.jbarn wrote:That's all fine and dandy, but there was a ton of material in the class and while it is admirable that you remember that, it is not reasonable to expect that everyone would, or that every instructor would cover it that intensely.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
#4. Any time you leave your gun in your car it is at risk of being stolen and used by a bad guy.Teamless wrote:Many reasons to get your CHL
1 - without your CHL, while it is legal (sometimes!) to have it in your vehicle, should you simply drive past a school, you are in violation of the federal law.
-- With CHL you are exempt from that law
-- Next time you are driving around your city, count how many times you drive within 1000 feet of a school.
--------------You may be surprised at the number. Even if it is low however, do you want to chance it?
2 - you are going to the mall, the bank, or grocery shopping. Yes, your gun is in your car/truck, but you aren't. You are in those places.
3 - Yes, you can carry at home, without a CHL. But do you ever leave your house or your car (as noted above?).
Personally, I think anyone who is legally allowed to get a CHL, should. If for no other that it is expressing your 2nd amendment rights (debate on whether a license is required aside)
And you live on this forum where you get reminded freqently.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
There is a forum member whose signature is "Carry 24/7 or guess right". That pretty much sums it up for me. The first time you need your weapon and don't have it, you'll understand why you should always carry. Hopefully you'll get another chance to make that decision after that experience. Some people don't.HoserBoi wrote:Good day all,
I'm new to this site, love it so far. So this past Saturday I took the CHL course and it left me with more doubts and questions. Going into the class I was pretty sure I wanted a CHL but coming out of it I left wondering if obtaining the license is actually even worth it. It is already legal to carry in the vehicle without a license, it's legal to have a weapon in your home without a license, and where we are allowed to carry with a license is pretty limited as it is, so having a license seems to only make you more liable and identifies you as an armed citizen. So I guess, I'm looking for some pro's I may be overlooking that could tip the pros vs, cons scale for me. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
You sound like Mrs. JMRA. She claims I live on here too.Keith B wrote:And you live on this forum where you get reminded freqently.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
Just tell her it's better than spending time at a bar.jmra wrote:You sound like Mrs. JMRA. She claims I live on here too.Keith B wrote:And you live on this forum where you get reminded freqently.jmra wrote:I understand, but it's been almost 7 years since my initial class and I clearly remember my instructor hammering home two things; where you could carry and when you could/should use your firearm. In fact, each of us had to recite "Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06" to the instructor before he would let us take the test. It was his way of making sure it registered.Keith B wrote:Many times students are coverd on this and just don't remember it. There is a ton of info thrown at you when going through the class, so it is a very common thing to forget it or miss it entirely.jmra wrote:It's a shame your instructor didn't make that perfectly clear during your class.
Good thing they cut the required class by half.HoserBoi wrote:Honestly, I'm more than sure it was covered. But there was just so much info. And these doubts came into play long after I had gone home. Otherwise I would have spoken to the instructor about my concerns.
I currently own a Springfield Armory 1911-A1, looking at getting an M&P Shield .40 for carry. Not sure I can pull of carrying the 1911. I've been told by several folks that they do. Perhaps it's just another excuse for me to add to my collection.surprise_i'm_armed wrote:HoserBoi:
Please follow through on your decision to carry.
What handgun(s) do you own, what will you carry, and have you considered your preferred carry rig?
All of us here on the board would like to see you carry SOMETHING every moment that you are awake, everywhere it is legal.
We all carry car insurance in force at all times. We never know when a wreck will occur.
It's the same thing with your handgun. Carry all the time. Bad guys don't set an appointment to rob you or carjack you.
SIA
