TexasCHLforum.com

nightmare wrote:

OldCurlyWolf wrote:According to TABC in 1978 it was not an offense to carry a rifle or a shotgun, aka longarm, in an establishment that sold alcoholic beverages.

It's still not an offense for the carrier but the business can lose their license to sell alcohol.

I read that in the current code. After I made the post.

Thanks, Chuck Bullitt for the link.

PC §30.06. TRESPASS BY HOLDER OF LICENSE TO CARRY
CONCEALED HANDGUN. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the
license holder:
(1) carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter
411, Government Code, on property of another without effective consent;
and
(2) received notice that:
(A) entry on the property by a license holder with a concealed
handgun was forbidden; or
(B) remaining on the property with a concealed handgun was
forbidden and failed to depart.
(b) For purposes of this section, a person receives notice if the owner
of the property or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner
provides notice to the person by oral or written communication.

My question since it was a spokesperson from corporate headquarters. does that constitute an oral communication and the statement in the news is that a written communication.

the spokesperson was saying they are "asking" not telling to carry weapons

RetNavy wrote:My question since it was a spokesperson from corporate headquarters. does that constitute an oral communication and the statement in the news is that a written communication.

Nope, does not constitute notice.

How does one prove that the CHL ever heard or saw a news report?

Jumping Frog wrote:

RetNavy wrote:My question since it was a spokesperson from corporate headquarters. does that constitute an oral communication and the statement in the news is that a written communication.

Nope, does not constitute notice.

How does one prove that the CHL ever heard or saw a news report?

And he only asked. He did not state that they were forbidding it.