Re: Males Are Now Wearing Makeup
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:17 pm
Theres now a picture of kim jong un wearing makeup going around facebook. Imo its an improvement
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Ummm, there is a difference between a riding heel on a man's boot and a spike heel on the wife's dress shoe.CoffeeNut wrote:Some of y'all might really lose your minds if you knew that high heels were originally made for men.
This is very true today but the original high heels, that started the trend, and were very much unisex were created for men. BBCanygunanywhere wrote:Ummm, there is a difference between a riding heel on a man's boot and a spike heel on the wife's dress shoe.CoffeeNut wrote:Some of y'all might really lose your minds if you knew that high heels were originally made for men.
Right. And as the article points out tall heels were developed for men to aid their warrior bad self on horseback. Quite manly. I'm gonna go put on my Tony Llamas.CoffeeNut wrote:This is very true today but the original high heels, that started the trend, and were very much unisex were created for men. BBCanygunanywhere wrote:Ummm, there is a difference between a riding heel on a man's boot and a spike heel on the wife's dress shoe.CoffeeNut wrote:Some of y'all might really lose your minds if you knew that high heels were originally made for men.
I'm not disagreeing that there is a huge difference between a riding heel and a modern woman's high heel but the article I linked to points out that once men started wearing heels for horseback/military purpose women started wearing the exact same things because that was the trend of the day. Then male aristocrats started wearing them and turned them into impractical shoes and women started doing the exact same thing. The only difference is that once they became so impractical that they weren't worth the effort to wear; men stopped wearing them and women carried on. So while the shoes may be drastically different today they were created for men and without the military need women probably wouldn't be fawning over $3,000 heels I can't pronounce.anygunanywhere wrote:Right. And as the article points out tall heels were developed for men to aid their warrior bad self on horseback. Quite manly. I'm gonna go put on my Tony Llamas.CoffeeNut wrote:This is very true today but the original high heels, that started the trend, and were very much unisex were created for men. BBCanygunanywhere wrote:Ummm, there is a difference between a riding heel on a man's boot and a spike heel on the wife's dress shoe.CoffeeNut wrote:Some of y'all might really lose your minds if you knew that high heels were originally made for men.
When I was working one job that occasionally had me in front of a (still) camera or giving a presentation, I used to know my shade in a couple brands of concealer. It was one of those situations where a shaving nick or scratch could really stand out, so it was a lot easier to just take ten seconds to cover it up and blend a bit.maintenanceguy wrote:although, I once used some sort of coverup on a giant pimple for prom photos a long, long time ago. It felt girly.
Well in my hippie days I had a hair practically to middle of my back. I wore it in a pony tail plenty of times.AndyC wrote:I looked like a raccoon - I'll have to ask my mom if she kept any ;)
How do you make a pony tail out of "a hair"?puma guy wrote:Well in my hippie days I had a hair practically to middle of my back. I wore it in a pony tail plenty of times.AndyC wrote:I looked like a raccoon - I'll have to ask my mom if she kept any ;)