Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:28 pm
by govnor
Don't know if you checked this out yet, but I just saw it on the website. Haven't seen one at a gun show yet, but NAA is making the derringer in .17 HMR and Mach 2! Awesome...I can't wait to get one. It might not stop a BG on impact, but at the velocities that these rounds can attain, it would certainly go through him.
http://www.naaminis.com/news12.html
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:59 pm
by Skiprr
Sigh...
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:27 pm
by govnor
Skiprr wrote:Sigh...
Oh come on...you know you want one! Besides, my primary gun is a XD .40... What're you carrying? A desert Eagle? I wouldn't be surprised (not that I don't want one of those too).
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:47 pm
by Skiprr
I carry .45 ACP in a 1911 platform, my young Paduan.
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:55 pm
by longtooth
Excellent carry weapon, even if I do say so sir.
Where in the internet do you get those grafics.
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:51 pm
by Crossfire
Skiprr wrote:
"If you don't have faith your handgun will stop an enraged 300lb powerlifter, get a bigger gun."
Sorry, can't help myself. That's just funny!
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:46 pm
by govnor
Skiprr wrote:I carry .45 ACP in a 1911 platform, my young Paduan.
Have you seen the movie "Ronin?" De Niro has a great line in it. They were talking about guns and the guy is insulted by the 1911 and calls it "an old gun." De Niro says: "It served my country well...for lots of years."
You guessed it, I'm not a big fan of the 1911, but I've owned one. I still don't see what's so wrong about my NAA .17. It can be carried in a shirt pocket! That has to amount to something...
From what I've seen and heard, 1911's are very sacred. Personally, I'd rather carry a more modern gun. The Para Ordnance sub-compact has piqued my interest lately though. I've thought about buying one, but I've heard negative things from purists.
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:46 pm
by Venus Pax
Skiprr wrote:I carry .45 ACP in a 1911 platform, my young Paduan.
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:53 pm
by longtooth
I do carry a 1911 in .45 ACP. I also read all the above posts about a .32 making someone mad & you then have to pistol whip them.
I dont see anyone standing in line to prove how ineffective they are at one shot stops.
Still dont want one for my primary carry though.
.17 HMR
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:17 pm
by res1b3uq
govnor wrote:Don't know if you checked this out yet, but I just saw it on the website. Haven't seen one at a gun show yet, but NAA is making the derringer in .17 HMR and Mach 2! Awesome...I can't wait to get one. It might not stop a BG on impact, but at the velocities that these rounds can attain, it would certainly go through him-------[.Don't think so. Those little .17's "splatter" when they hit. Have to aim for head shot on anything larger than a rabbit.]
http://www.naaminis.com/news12.html
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:57 pm
by westernamerican
Anyone care about owning a Beretta LNIB 22LR pistol? 
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:28 pm
by Moonpie
Most 22LR autos aren't a good choice for a back-up.
As a fun shooter/plinker they are great.
Trouble is they gum up real bad and require a lot of cleaning.
Any of the name brand 22 autos will serve as a plinker.
The Ruger MKII is a very popular model with TONS of aftermarket accessories.
For a back-up you might want to consider a .32acp as a minimum.
I highly recommend the Seecamp LWS-32.
It is the smallest 32 out there right now and built solid as a rock.
There are several very effective factory loadings for it.
It ain't cheap but you shouldn't bet your life on cheap.
