Page 2 of 4

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:42 pm
by Tracker
The Wall wrote:Where are the husbands? Probably all out at the shooting range. :lol:
Yeah....at one of these other hen parties who look like they are having a lot more fun

Image

Image

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 6:02 pm
by Jim Beaux
Tracker wrote:
The Wall wrote:Where are the husbands? Probably all out at the shooting range. :lol:
Yeah....at one of these other hen parties who look like they are have a lot more fun

[ Image ]

[ Image ]
They sure look a lot better than the OCT bunch. :woohoo

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:47 am
by C-dub
We should demand that MDA be labeled a terrorist organization.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:49 am
by jmra
C-dub wrote:We should demand that MDA be labeled a terrorist organization.
:iagree:

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:42 pm
by jason812
Jim Beaux wrote: They sure look a lot better than the OCT bunch. :woohoo
Have you ever noticed that liberal women=ugly. For some reason conservative women are more attractive.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:56 pm
by mojo84
I would love to see one of them prosecuted for making a false statement when making a MWAG or Swatting call.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:26 am
by NTexCopRetired
Did anyone notice the lack of diversity in their group? They are pretty much cookie cutter, white, suburban, socialite types looking for the next "politically correct" cause to support in order to ease the misery of the downtrodden that are beneath their social standing. Probably a parking lot full of minivans. Car pooling never occurs to them.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:42 am
by chasfm11
mojo84 wrote:I would love to see one of them prosecuted for making a false statement when making a MWAG or Swatting call.
I don't remember the specific day but there is was a call on our local social media group for all the local supporters of Moms to wear orange and a reasonable number posted saying that they had.

I wrote a letter to our local police chief, asking some general questions about how his department was planning to deal with the changes after January 1st. I specifically asked about "embellished" reporting to dispatch for MWAG, based on the number of local Mom supporters and their overt opposition to OC. I think that he and his officers are in a difficult situation if that happens. Obviously, the claim will be that the gun was not in the holster and it could be a he said-she said as to whether that was true. A situation like that is definitely a consideration for OC.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:12 am
by VMI77
Jeff B. wrote:A collection of empty vessels getting filled with the standard anti-gun clap trap. Do you think even a one of them considers that they are advocating infringing if not removing our Constitutional Rights?

Smile for the camera like good little Progressives...

Jeff B.
They most likely have very little understanding of the Constitution, but I doubt it matters as if they did they wouldn't care.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:15 am
by VMI77
treadlightly wrote:I wonder if anyone will be left with either the will or the means to protect them?

Paraphrasing Kennedy, a gathering maelstrom sinks all boats.
I've already lost the will to protect "them." They've chosen their side and it's not mine. They're on their own as far as I'm concerned.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:24 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
NTexCopRetired wrote:Did anyone notice the lack of diversity in their group? They are pretty much cookie cutter, white, suburban, socialite types looking for the next "politically correct" cause to support in order to ease the misery of the downtrodden that are beneath their social standing. Probably a parking lot full of minivans. Car pooling never occurs to them.
I did notice that! It looks like a female WASP luncheon.

Chas.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:32 pm
by omegaman
I did notice that! It looks like a female WASP luncheon.
Chas.
What do you have against WASPs Charles?

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:34 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
omegaman wrote:
I did notice that! It looks like a female WASP luncheon.
Chas.
What do you have against WASPs Charles?
Nothing, as long as they are on my side! I should have said "unarmed female WASP luncheon." :smilelol5:

Chas.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:51 am
by XinTX
C-dub wrote:We should demand that MDA be labeled a terrorist organization.
I wouldn't go that far (not that it isn't a good idea mind you). But they should be sanctioned somehow. They gave false testimony during some of the hearings. I'd wager they knew it was false, but did it anyway. At a minimum, during the next session when a 2A bill is being debated, if MDA will be invited to testify (as they likely will), that it be read into the record that they have a history of providing false statements to the TX Lege.

They need to pay SOME price for lying to the legislature.

Re: Moms Demand 2016 and beyond

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 9:26 am
by Salty1
I would like to have their names and address so I could send them firearms related holiday cards....