Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
ShootDontTalk
Senior Member
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Near Houston

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by ShootDontTalk »

PBratton wrote: Ah, but what IS a minority nowadays?
Someone who carries a 1911 and not a Glock? :lol:




Sorry, I couldn't help it.
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!
Eli Wallach on concealed carry while taking a bubble bath
PBratton
Senior Member
Posts: 1487
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:47 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by PBratton »

ShootDontTalk wrote:
PBratton wrote: Ah, but what IS a minority nowadays?
Someone who carries a 1911 and not a Glock? :lol:




Sorry, I couldn't help it.

Guess I REALLY am a minority then...
http://www.GeeksFirearms.com NFA dealer.
$25 Transfers in the Sugar Land, Richmond/Rosenburg areas, every 25th transfer I process is free

Active Military, Veterans, Law Enforcement, Fire, EMS receive $15 transfers.

NRA Patron Member, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, NRA Certified CRSO, Tx LTC Instructor
SC-Texas
Junior Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by SC-Texas »

And this is why we needed that amendment.

I am hoping one of the cities will screw up bad enough to make a lawsuit viable.

That is the best way to stop this behavior
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by jmra »

SC-Texas wrote:And this is why we needed that amendment.

I am hoping one of the cities will screw up bad enough to make a lawsuit viable.

That is the best way to stop this behavior
IF (as in big IF) enough people OC and there are significant negative encounters with LEO of the non-OCT variety, we will see changes in the '17 session.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar
Deltaboy
Senior Member
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Johnson County TX

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by Deltaboy »

I just call it Nannyism and at steady change from Rural to Suburb living.
I 'm just an Ole Sinner saved by Grace and Smith & Wesson.
stroo
Senior Member
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Coppell

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by stroo »

I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by anygunanywhere »

stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by jmra »

anygunanywhere wrote:
stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?
I understand his point. I lived in La for 30 years and never saw a single person OC. It doesn't mean no one OCed during that time, it simply means that it was so rare that it is a statistical non-event.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Federal ruling for detaining OC for no crime commited

Post by anygunanywhere »

jmra wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?
I understand his point. I lived in La for 30 years and never saw a single person OC. It doesn't mean no one OCed during that time, it simply means that it was so rare that it is a statistical non-event.
Just checking.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”