TexasCHLforum.com

If it's attached to a belt and worn like a belt I expect it won't be an issue if you attach it to a belt and do not wear the belt like a normal belt, you probably should be prepared to take the ride and hope you have a good lawyer and sympathetic jury.

I want to thank Mr. Cotton for posting the link to that Houston police townhall video. Even though I don't live anywhere near Houston, it was good to get a "big city police" perspective on the matter. Surprisingly, I found them to be very level-headed in their responses; not what I expected at all. Oh, and I believe the Chief said "concealed means concealed".

twomillenium wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

twomillenium wrote:In a court of law, common sense has little to do with it, since common sense is a variable. Just look at the news.

I said common sense and where belts are designed to be worn.

I know.

Then you should know that common sense and the design of the belt together make it obvious, even in a court of law.

mojo84 wrote:

twomillenium wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

twomillenium wrote:In a court of law, common sense has little to do with it, since common sense is a variable. Just look at the news.

I said common sense and where belts are designed to be worn.

I know.

Then you should know that common sense and the design of the belt together make it obvious, even in a court of law.

I guess the dictionary would not count then. Mark Twain was credited for saying "Common sense is not so common." I stand by my statements.
As far as open carry goes, I prefer the element of surprise.

Garter belts?