The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.

A complete waste of bytes and pointless.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.
The OP doesn't want to cause a problem for a relative that works at the restaurant.tlt wrote:The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.![]()
A complete waste of bytes and pointless.
I could see it if they used their real name as their username like you do Charles, but he / she is fairly anonymous with their username. I would like to know the name of the establishment as well.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The OP doesn't want to cause a problem for a relative that works at the restaurant.tlt wrote:The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.![]()
A complete waste of bytes and pointless.
Chas.
Another reason to not use a HAM handle as a forum user name.kg5ie wrote:Relative works there. Don't want to get her in trouble.
I understand, sorry if I'm out of line, I just don't get the reason to bring it up if that is the case.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The OP doesn't want to cause a problem for a relative that works at the restaurant.tlt wrote:The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.![]()
A complete waste of bytes and pointless.
Chas.
Guess I missed that. He can PM me and I'll post it.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The OP doesn't want to cause a problem for a relative that works at the restaurant.tlt wrote:The Wall wrote:This post is meaningless until the place is named in my opinion.![]()
A complete waste of bytes and pointless.
Chas.
It's my understanding that the establishment referenced is "Eddie V's".....RoyGBiv wrote:If someone else who is in the know wants to PM the name to me ill post it.
http://www.eddiev.com/legal-noticesDear (2ACheck):
Our guests’ safety is our number one priority and we are committed to delighting all of our guests with an outstanding dining experience.
If a state or local government allows or does not specifically ban weapons (concealed and/or open) in restaurants that serve alcohol, we don’t ban them either. Even if businesses are allowed to “opt out” by posting signage indicating weapons are not allowed, we don’t believe in implementing procedures that conflict with what the state or local government intends. Our company has faced this situation in several cities and there haven’t been any issues from not posting an “opt out” sign.
We do not allow employees to carry weapons while working. However, if state or local laws allow employees to keep a weapon in their personal vehicle while on the job, we follow the law as written.
These policies are the same for all the brands in Darden Restaurants’ portfolio, and as with all of our company policies they are not subject to an individual manager’s discretion. If you were to see a “no guns” sign in a Darden restaurant where concealed and/or open-carry weapons are legally allowed, please contact our Guest Relations Department at 1-800-562-7837 and we will follow up with that restaurant management team.
I hope this answers your questions, (2ACheck), and we hope to see you in one of our restaurants soon!
We appreciate the time you took to contact us.
Sincerely,
Shari
Red Lobster Guest Relations