TexasCHLforum.com

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences

In other words, rule of law prevails so long as the powers-that-be want it to -- meaning that there is no effective rule of law anymore. 240 years ago, English colonists decided that rule of man was no longer acceptable, and now we find it expected. We have fallen far indeed.

Jusme wrote:Still think the AG meeting with Slick Willy was just talking about grandkids?

Even if this were true...no other 'conversation' was needed. A/G got her 'start' because of the Clinton's. Nothing had to be 'said'. The message was 'delivered' the moment Bill entered her private plane.

I could do the same thing with my Daughter, IF she were to do something I didn't approve of, I wouldn't need to even bring it up, let alone talk about it (though we would). A simple 'knowing look' would be readily understood and acknowledged.

No kidding. She deleted 30,000 emails, stored classified information on private server and then no charges. There was no intention nor conspiracy to dodge the Freedom Act to access public information. She sent en email to modify a classified doc and send it over unsecured fax. Ha ha ha ha , no charges.

I should become a democrat so I can break laws too.
I just heard on the radio (trying to find a link) that Obumer is giving her a ride on Air Force One to Charlotte for a fundraiser. Why do we as Americans have to fund her travels???

Why there was no independent Prosecutor or Grand Jury indictment?

Beiruty wrote:Why there was no independent Prosecutor or Grand Jury indictment?

Because the rule of law and such no longer pertain to the ruling elite.

canvasbck wrote:.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences

Quoted from Comey's statement.

I have no words

Maybe that was his way of making a canary announcement, sort of like a company that's received a National Security Letter.

The Clintons touched an untouchable.

Beiruty wrote:Why there was no independent Prosecutor or Grand Jury indictment?

Why are there no impeachment proceedings from the eunuchs in the GOP majority? Nixon was impeached for far less! This may be a more corrupt administration than that of U.S. Grant?

treadlightly wrote:

canvasbck wrote:.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences

Quoted from Comey's statement.

I have no words

Maybe that was his way of making a canary announcement, sort of like a company that's received a National Security Letter.

The Clintons touched an untouchable.

He is saying ever dare to do what Hilary did, we will drop a Thor hammer on your head. However, Hilary is just like a Ghost.

treadlightly wrote:The Clintons touched an untouchable.

The Clintons regard nothing as untouchable if they desire to do so. If Hillary Clinton is elected, I believe that the two of them will make Obama look like a JV team member in trashing what's left of this Republic. By that, I mean that what Obama has done so far will pale in comparison to what Hillary has in mind for us. At this point she has no reason to fear the Justice Department and the FBI, the soon to be majority left wing SCOTUS or the trembling bunch of Republican losers in Congress.

I disagree with the thread title. I heard Comey say that there was clear evidence that she committed felony level offenses, but that he did not think she should be prosecuted. This right after he said that he was not going to make decisions on whether or not she was prosecuted.......

As I have said from the beginning, nothing will happen.
The corrupt is protecting the corrupt.

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!!!

I'm not in the least bit suprised that there is no indictment forthcoming. Not at all. What I'm shocked and saddened by is Comey openly admitting that us peon citizens would face "concequences" under "similar circumstances".

Anyone think that the next presidential election is not rigged?