Page 2 of 2
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:07 pm
by Lynyrd
TVGuy wrote:Unfortunately, I don't think it's possible to have privacy anymore. That is unless you're in the middle of nowhere, completely off the grid and no phone, banking, internet, etc.
Even then, if you look up they got you.
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:29 pm
by mojo84
Even little ol' Boerne has them.
For those that think they have privacy when out in public, Google "live public webcams".
Also, check into "live traffic cams".
I'm a little surprised this seems to be new news.
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:20 am
by XinTX
It seems like "Big Brother" is becoming "Creepy Stalker ex-Girlfriend".
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:38 pm
by mojo84
New York taking the next step with public cameras all in the name of safety.
http://www.vocativ.com/365430/ny-facial ... s-tunnels/
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:46 pm
by Abraham
glympse = glimpse?
Or does glympse have another meaning?
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:51 pm
by Pawpaw
Abraham wrote:glympse = glimpse?
Or does glympse have another meaning?
This is what I did:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=glympse
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 2:12 pm
by mojo84
Glympse is voluntary participation.
https://www.glympse.com
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:14 pm
by Abraham
Thanks Pawpaw
Seems I just don't cotton to these new fangly thingamabobs.
Now, where's my sledge hammer?
If it can't be fixed with it, it aint worth botherin with...
Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:15 pm
by Flightmare
Abraham wrote:Thanks Pawpaw
Seems I just don't cotton to these new fangly thingamabobs.
Now, where's my sledge hammer?
If it can't be fixed with it, it aint worth botherin with...
I've found many things can be fixed with percussive maintenance

Re: BIG BROTHER
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:54 am
by Glockster
WTR wrote:There was no web site mentioned for general public viewing. They stated that the tapes would be stored for 30 days for the Police to ID criminals and witnesses. If a witness does not come forward voluntarily, what pressures would be applied to extract their account of a crime?
As far as cameras and plate readers being utilized in the past, this is true at the Border crossings , which is on Federal land and done by the DEA. These methods have not been utilized on City and State land or roadways. If cameras had been utilized, why haven't the Police utilized them for the purpose they are claiming now?
I lived for 27 years in a town that had cameras all over the boardwalk area since 9/11 and they had facial recognition software tied to the big system in the sky, and license plate readers tied to the DMV. They never had a single hit on facial recognition, but they used the heck out of the plate readers to curtail cruising the boardwalk. I know that I certainly slept more safely knowing that nobody could circle the strip more than twice ever 30 minutes.