Page 2 of 3

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 11:59 am
by TexasJohnBoy
Hildebeast is joining in
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/26/politics/ ... index.html

What about respecting and accepting the results of the election?

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:35 pm
by parabelum
Just a leftist drama and waste of money.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:54 pm
by dhoobler
Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 5e89b2cc0a

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:11 pm
by Bitter Clinger
Image

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:13 pm
by Pawpaw
dhoobler wrote:Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 5e89b2cc0a
But no eye on "inside interference", like from the DNC,

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:23 pm
by satcong
parabelum wrote:Just a leftist drama and waste of money.
It's not their money and maybe they can tamper with enough ballots this time, like LBJ.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:34 pm
by TexasJohnBoy
Bitter Clinger wrote:Image
Let's call for recounts in all of those states too. Equally waste everyone's time.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:38 pm
by parabelum
Think about the statement below:

"We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states -- Michigan -- well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... e-recounts

It's all a sham. These rats crave attention, desperately.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 1:45 pm
by John Galt
satcong wrote:
parabelum wrote:Just a leftist drama and waste of money.
It's not their money and maybe they can tamper with enough ballots this time, like LBJ.
That's how liberals roll, the epitome of corruption.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 2:12 pm
by doncb
Whining about Hillary winning the "popular vote" so she should be President. Sorry. That isn't the way it works. Are you too stupid to understand that?

Members of the electoral college receiving death threats. I guess tolerance only goes one way. Libs have no tolerance for opinions other than their own.

Hillary, who tried to trap Trump into saying he would respect the results, is now participating in "recounts". Recounts that won't change a thing. Sore looser.

News flash snowflake. Your socialist / communist candidate LOST. GET OVER IT. The democratic process worked. Just because it didn't have the result you felt entitled to isn't an excuse for the way you're acting. If it will make you feel better you can have a ribbon for participation.

Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red? I demand it be changed! Otherwise I'm going to go block a street and cry until I get my way!

It is always referred to as the "democratic" party. Nothing "democratic" about it. We live in a democratic society. We have republicans and democrats.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 2:48 pm
by John Galt
doncb wrote:

Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red?
Years ago it was that way, Republican blue/Democrat red. I don't remember the year it was changed.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:08 pm
by pushpullpete
I'm glad the traitor lost.
:txflag: :patriot:
I may be wrong, if I am please explain but, I thought that the recount was not financed by
taxpayer money but instead by 'donations' collected from private sources. Stein did come
up w the money awfully quick but, I still don't see Trump losing very many votes or hrc
gaining enough to bother w a recount. That being said (realizing that much will go directly
into some chronies pocket) a portion of that $4-6 million will go back into the economy
in the form of someones neighbor buying groceries. True or not ?

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:56 pm
by Pawpaw
John Galt wrote:
doncb wrote:

Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red?
Years ago it was that way, Republican blue/Democrat red. I don't remember the year it was changed.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/w ... 104176297/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... al-colors/

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:10 pm
by parabelum
pushpullpete wrote:I'm glad the traitor lost.
:txflag: :patriot:
I may be wrong, if I am please explain but, I thought that the recount was not financed by
taxpayer money but instead by 'donations' collected from private sources. Stein did come
up w the money awfully quick but, I still don't see Trump losing very many votes or hrc
gaining enough to bother w a recount. That being said (realizing that much will go directly
into some chronies pocket) a portion of that $4-6 million will go back into the economy
in the form of someones neighbor buying groceries. True or not ?
I don't think so. If they were truly so concerned with their Lib voter base, they wouldn't have cheated ol' Commie Bernie out of the process.

Now there's a recount that witch ought to be alright with... :roll:


Progs have always been for themselves only. They are the enemy within.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:34 pm
by doncb
parabelum wrote:Think about the statement below:

"We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states -- Michigan -- well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... e-recounts

It's all a sham. These rats crave attention, desperately.
Reading some of the comments by those in the Clinton camp, they just won't let it go. They just can't accept the reality that she lost. I have a relative that is a flaming liberal that actually had to take anxiety medication after the election. I don't think he will ever accept the results. He'd probably send money for the recount.