Page 2 of 2

Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 3:33 pm
by Abraham
"Should Be": The national anthem of wishful thinking people everywhere!

I should be: Younger/Look more like a human being rather than a troglodyte/Fabulously wealthy/Able to buy that villa in Tuscany I've always wanted/ and the list goes on and on and on...

I should be, sob, cough, choke, sniffle...able to...fly...without the aid of an airplane...

Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 3:54 pm
by tbrown
Sad but true Abraham. Until "We the People" are willing to enforce "Shall Not Be Infringed" on the United States Constitution's "enemies, foreign and domestic" there's no reason for the forces of Mordor to back off.

Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 7:56 pm
by Keith B
superchief wrote:Why limit it to LTC holders? Tell your representatives to support the "Hearing Protection Act" and let freedom ring!
Instead of your ears......