TexasCHLforum.com

Posted: **Wed Jul 25, 2018 2:37 pm**

I did choose poorly. The terminology associated with geometry was never my strong suit.

Posted: **Wed Jul 25, 2018 2:43 pm**

AndyC wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:52 pm
Maxwell wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:35 pm I was just thinking that lowering the angle of intersection would flatten out the arc.
Arcs are useful, giving you the option to decide which results you want:

Very informative! Thank Andy!

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:05 pm**

AndyC wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:52 pm
Maxwell wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:35 pm I was just thinking that lowering the angle of intersection would flatten out the arc.
Arcs are useful, giving you the option to decide which results you want:

That's why I like the 100yd, because everything else will be a 'hold over' . . . and I don't know that I'll ever have an opportunity to go longer than that.

Posted: **Sun Jul 29, 2018 5:33 am**

jsenner wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:04 am Where did you get them?

There was a run of Chinese fakes of these exact sights a while ago and they were VERY well faked,

...

- all of them had those pins walk out like that.

Not to mention the very genuine but still made in China Magpul PTS sights.

TexasCHLforum.com

Magpul MBUS sights beware

Re: Magpul MBUS sights beware

Re: Magpul MBUS sights beware

Re: Magpul MBUS sights beware

Re: Magpul MBUS sights beware