Re: Gun range accidental shooting
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:25 pm
If you point a gun at another person and pull the trigger, how is that an accidental shooting? 

The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
It is if you are an FBI agent and have cool dance moves!BBYC wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:25 pm If you point a gun at another person and pull the trigger, how is that an accidental shooting?![]()
That's one way to end the argument, I suppose. Don't see how that can be called a "accidental discharge."Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
Scott B. wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:30 pmThat's one way to end the argument, I suppose. Don't see how that can be called a "accidental discharge."Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
Don't see how that can be called a "accidental discharge."
I’m guessing finger on the trigger of a no-safety, striker fired, semi auto pistol. Ignored a few of the four simple rules.Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
What makes you think that? The trigger on my 1911 is lighter than the one on my Glock. You may very well be correct, but unless this was intentional it could also be due to muscle memory and whatever actions the shooter regularly practices when on the range. If it was an accident it was complete stupidity that he even drew the loaded gun from the holster in the first place.Chaparral wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:15 pmI’m guessing finger on the trigger of a no-safety, striker fired, semi auto pistol. Ignored a few of the four simple rules.Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
Shocking! Newsweek is still around?Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
Blame it on the gun, really?Chaparral wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:15 pmI’m guessing finger on the trigger of a no-safety, striker fired, semi auto pistol. Ignored a few of the four simple rules.Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992
Not blaming the gun, they don't just "go off" on their own. Given the information that they were "discussing tactics", I am making the assumption that the shooter broke at least two of the four cardinal rules, I'm also guessing that his gun performed as designed, but offered no guard against his critical mistakes. Pure conjecture on my part, though.Bitter Clinger wrote: Sat Jul 28, 2018 8:18 amBlame it on the gun, really?Chaparral wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:15 pmI’m guessing finger on the trigger of a no-safety, striker fired, semi auto pistol. Ignored a few of the four simple rules.Allons wrote: Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:07 pm This article said they were discussing tactics behind a counter when the employee pulled a loaded gun from his holster and shot him.
https://www.newsweek.com/san-antonio-gu ... ge-1043992![]()