The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Makes you wonder about how the algorithm is written, doesn’t it? I wonder if the same thing would have happened had I had the foresight to delete Chelsea Handler’s twitter handle from my reply. I didn’t even think of it at the time.montgomery wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 4:07 pm AI BOT, not a human that flagged your post based on how you are profiled through social media associations and posts.
Me too!!lonestar144 wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:10 pm I am in complete envy of you. I have several posts on FB, that I would think would be worthy of a slap, but noooo, they allowed me to keep them up.
You do us proud TAM.The Annoyed Man wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 1:26 pm I got suspended for 12 hours on Twitter for calling a spade a spade. Oddly enough, I in no way promoted violence against, threatened, or harassed Chelsea Handler. I was replying to an article posted by BreitbartNews about Chelsea Handler alleging that Justice Clarence Thomas is still as much a sexual predator today as much as he was in 1991. The funny thing was, the suspension notice I got didn’t take more than about 15 seconds after I posted my response. Obviously, Handler has someone monitoring her account 24/7 and complaining in real time. What a wuss.
I contacted twitter support to protest the decision, and got a message saying that it would take at least 24-48 hours for them to respond. So there’s no effective appeal for my 12 hour timeout.
This is what social media has come to......and so far, my experience had been that Twitter was much less restrictive than Facebook. I guess not.
I’ll wear it as a badge of honor, and put a big red X next to my handle.
Another friend of mine suggested I use “slattern”, a word I have used before, but not in a long time.OneGun wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:03 pm If you would have called her a "skunk", you would not have been banned. Twitter likes "Skunk".
Had to look that one up!The Annoyed Man wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:36 pmAnother friend of mine suggested I use “slattern”, a word I have used before, but not in a long time.OneGun wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:03 pm If you would have called her a "skunk", you would not have been banned. Twitter likes "Skunk".
Well get an account and go post something on Art Acevedos account so he can block you too. I keep calling out that knuckle head.Lynyrd wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:01 pm
I don't twit/tweet. But it is no secret that liberals only believe in free speech when it is speech they agree with. Otherwise, they do everything in their power to silence that speech. Your post epitomizes their hypocrisy!
You go TAM!!The Annoyed Man wrote: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:04 pm I still have 2 hours 23 minutes to go before i can start tearing up Twitter again.
Not really an appropriate term if you were distributing CH. However, more accurate discriptors for her most likely would have gotten you banned again.The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Sep 21, 2018 12:36 am I’m back! I led with “slattern”. Let’s see people rushing to their dictionaries.
