Re: 2016: Deplorables 2020: Enemies of the state
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:36 pm
IIRC, there's been some ruling about being allowed to record public servants without getting their permission.BSHII wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:32 amThe answer to the second Tweeter's question is "Yes," of course. California law only requires two-party consent to record confidential communications. A "confidential communication" is "any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering . . . or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded." Walking around in someone else's business is not a "confidential communication," and a business owner certainly does not need guests' consent to record surveillance footage in her own business.The Annoyed Man wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:06 am Nancy Pelosi caught on business security camera violating California law shuttering hair salons, without wearing a mask:
https://twitter.com/richardgrenell/stat ... 18688?s=21
Politico's reporting on it: did the salon break California law by videotaping someone without their consent? You can’t make this kind of comedy gold up.
https://twitter.com/cmarinucci/status/1 ... 27969?s=21
Not sure whether that requires "on the job" to be valid...
Either way..... That particular Genie is out of the bottle.
I dare you to bring charges against the salon owner... That would be interesting.
