TexasCHLforum.com

Does the officer work for HLS&R or for the public?

Well, show's over.

Our illustrious AG's office did nothing (again).

We have almost a full year until it starts again in 2017.
We need to really work on the AG's office and push them to get moving on their job of enforcing the law. Not just for the Rodeo, but for all public places that are trying to prevent us from exercising our right on public property.

FWIW, yesterday's security was even more of a joke. I didn't carry because I didn't want to get sent back to my car, but I could have easily. They didn't care when the magnetometer went off and didn't wand me afterwards. I have a committee badge which they could blame the magnetometer's sound for, so I could have easily carried. Oh well.

Hopefully next year, it's clearly a non-issue as the AG better had do his job!!

The AG doing nothing and someone at the roadeo saying they will just pay the daily fine really bothers me. I live out in the country with a business next door who has the same attitude. I have got them fined, wrote by the epa and they dont care because I cost them less than they are making. They just do the very minimum to keep from getting shut down and keep going. Eventually it has to stop.
The AG needs to do something or it needs to go to a higher level. It sholdnt be a double standard, if we have to follow the law why shouldn't property owners, the city, etc. Why treat the law abiding citizens like criminals?

minytrker,

You posted: "I live out in the country with a business next door who has the same attitude. I have got them fined, wrote by the epa and they dont care because I cost them less than they are making."

Would you please elaborate as I don't understand your post.

What process got the business fined?

I don't understand what "wrote by the epa" means?

How do you cost them, at all?

Thanks!

They are doing things illegally so I turn them into the EPA which results in writeups and fines.

minytrker,

Thanks.

Color me curious: What sorts of illegal activity are they involved in?

You've not mentioned anything specific, so it should be ok to discuss details.

Thanks Again!

minytrker wrote:They are doing things illegally so I turn them into the EPA which results in writeups and fines.

Sic'em minytrker! Go get'em son! Show them who's boss!

Abraham wrote:minytrker,

Thanks.

Color me curious: What sorts of illegal activity are they involved in?

You've not mentioned anything specific, so it should be ok to discuss details.

Thanks Again!

At this point, we should know specifics.

I guess now that the rodeo is over they have even less of a reason to do anything?

winters wrote:I guess now that the rodeo is over they have even less of a reason to do anything?

I wouldn't necessarily say that. Like myself, others who have filed formal complaints with the AG's office have likely received correspondence stating that the matter is being investigated. Until I myself receive notice that the mater is closed I'm going to assume the process is working. If I fail to receive further notice within a reasonable amount time you can rest assured I will follow up with the AG's office concerning my complaint.

Granted the process worked too slow to make a difference at this year's rodeo, but I remain optimistic that it will be resolved before next year.

minytrker wrote:The AG doing nothing and someone at the roadeo saying they will just pay the daily fine really bothers me.

Unfortunately this is not uncommon. I was on a jury where the defendant was charged with a city ordinance violation for posting temporary signs without a permit. He basically testified in court that he had tried advertising via standard methods and it was very costly and didn't gain him as much as signs did. We could tell he was playing the system and the fines. He would request a jury trial, plead that he was just a poor immigrant who was trying to make a living, and hope the jury would reduce his fine from the maximum. Unfortunately, even as the foreman, I couldn't convince two female jurors that he needed to be hit with the maximum fine. So in the interest of not holding the Judge and others up the other 3 male jurors and I agreed to reduce the fine to what the ladies wanted of $250 from $500. So, while he was fined, he still won by getting the fine reduced. We found out afterward from the city code inspector that this was his 5th incident in court and he had two additional tickets pending for the exact same thing.

Jeff Barriault wrote:

winters wrote:I guess now that the rodeo is over they have even less of a reason to do anything?

I wouldn't necessarily say that. Like myself, others who have filed formal complaints with the AG's office have likely received correspondence stating that the matter is being investigated. Until I myself receive notice that the mater is closed I'm going to assume the process is working. If I fail to receive further notice within a reasonable amount time you can rest assured I will follow up with the AG's office concerning my complaint.

Granted the process worked too slow to make a difference at this year's rodeo, but I remain optimistic that it will be resolved before next year.

Could always carry, then when wanded tell them they cannot legally keep you from entering, then sue, especially if they try and give you some sort of ticket/free cop car ride.

Keith B wrote:

minytrker wrote:The AG doing nothing and someone at the roadeo saying they will just pay the daily fine really bothers me.

Unfortunately this is not uncommon. I was on a jury where the defendant was charged with a city ordinance violation for posting temporary signs without a permit. He basically testified in court that he had tried advertising via standard methods and it was very costly and didn't gain him as much as signs did. We could tell he was playing the system and the fines. He would request a jury trial, plead that he was just a poor immigrant who was trying to make a living, and hope the jury would reduce his fine from the maximum. Unfortunately, even as the foreman, I couldn't convince two female jurors that he needed to be hit with the maximum fine. So in the interest of not holding the Judge and others up the other 3 male jurors and I agreed to reduce the fine to what the ladies wanted of $250 from $500. So, while he was fined, he still won by getting the fine reduced. We found out afterward from the city code inspector that this was his 5th incident in court and he had two additional tickets pending for the exact same thing.

Would like someone to try this if they say that the city will just pay the fines - carry at rodeo, then when wanded tell them they cannot legally keep you from entering, then sue, especially if they try and give you some sort of ticket/free cop car ride.

This past Saturday I attended the San Jacinto College graduation at NRG Stadium to watch a long time friend receive his diploma. I observed several San Jac PD officers working security but they were not checking individuals for weapons, merely being a presence. My wife and I wondered while driving to Houston to attend this if they would be doing any screening for weapons since it was a college function. As always, we were both carrying as we are commissioned peace officers.

locke_n_load wrote:

Keith B wrote:

minytrker wrote:The AG doing nothing and someone at the roadeo saying they will just pay the daily fine really bothers me.

Unfortunately this is not uncommon. I was on a jury where the defendant was charged with a city ordinance violation for posting temporary signs without a permit. He basically testified in court that he had tried advertising via standard methods and it was very costly and didn't gain him as much as signs did. We could tell he was playing the system and the fines. He would request a jury trial, plead that he was just a poor immigrant who was trying to make a living, and hope the jury would reduce his fine from the maximum. Unfortunately, even as the foreman, I couldn't convince two female jurors that he needed to be hit with the maximum fine. So in the interest of not holding the Judge and others up the other 3 male jurors and I agreed to reduce the fine to what the ladies wanted of $250 from $500. So, while he was fined, he still won by getting the fine reduced. We found out afterward from the city code inspector that this was his 5th incident in court and he had two additional tickets pending for the exact same thing.

Would like someone to try this if they say that the city will just pay the fines - carry at rodeo, then when wanded tell them they cannot legally keep you from entering, then sue, especially if they try and give you some sort of ticket/free cop car ride.

If they get the right jury for the civil trial, the payout should be enough to dissuade any further criminal behavior by the folks who run the city.