Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:41 pm
So, I guess I'm on a roll. Here's the situation:
I went to the downtown office of the Bexar County (San Antonio) Tax Assessor Collector this afternoon. There was no 30.06 sign on the door or otherwise, but when I went in, there was a metal detector and x-ray (or similar) machine to scan bags. The guy said I needed to scan my backpack (which had my pistol in it). I hesitated, not sure what to do, but didn't want to alarm anyone by turning and heading out the door at that point. The guy scanned it and told me that I couldn't come in with that (at which time he understood my earlier hesitation). I mentioned that there was no sign, and he said there was a letter on the door. On the outside, automatic door, on the stationary portion was a 2-page letter in normal 10-12 pt font. The doors are tinted, and the movable portion has other text written in stick-on letters, so to see this when the door is open (which happens automatically when you walk up), you have to see through 2 tinted pieces of glass one of which has text on it, to read a 2 page letter. The letter does not have any resemblance of the 30.06 prohibition language, but is a record of some Bexar County Court instructing the facility to post (as I recall) "signs in accordance with 30.05 to prohibit the carrying of concealed weapons" into this facility. Note that the recommended signage has not been posted.
So, as I understand, this is an area that would fall under 30.06(e) and if they had a 30.06 sign, it would not be binding. In addition, they don't have a 30.06 sign. BUT, they have a metal detector, bag scanner, and that ends up being followed with a verbal notice, which IS binding, right? So what is the out here? It seems to me completely against the spirit of the written law, but might actually have found a loophole. Can I do something about this? Who should I write to or talk with? Recommendations?
The facility in question is responsible for collecting property tax, vehicle registration fees, and performing title transfers and the like. It is definitely not a court or a city council meeting. I don't know if they have the whole building or what else might be contained in this building.
This ticked me off. It seems such an abuse of power and blatant disregard for my rights. Am I off base? I'm interested in recommendations.
I went to the downtown office of the Bexar County (San Antonio) Tax Assessor Collector this afternoon. There was no 30.06 sign on the door or otherwise, but when I went in, there was a metal detector and x-ray (or similar) machine to scan bags. The guy said I needed to scan my backpack (which had my pistol in it). I hesitated, not sure what to do, but didn't want to alarm anyone by turning and heading out the door at that point. The guy scanned it and told me that I couldn't come in with that (at which time he understood my earlier hesitation). I mentioned that there was no sign, and he said there was a letter on the door. On the outside, automatic door, on the stationary portion was a 2-page letter in normal 10-12 pt font. The doors are tinted, and the movable portion has other text written in stick-on letters, so to see this when the door is open (which happens automatically when you walk up), you have to see through 2 tinted pieces of glass one of which has text on it, to read a 2 page letter. The letter does not have any resemblance of the 30.06 prohibition language, but is a record of some Bexar County Court instructing the facility to post (as I recall) "signs in accordance with 30.05 to prohibit the carrying of concealed weapons" into this facility. Note that the recommended signage has not been posted.
So, as I understand, this is an area that would fall under 30.06(e) and if they had a 30.06 sign, it would not be binding. In addition, they don't have a 30.06 sign. BUT, they have a metal detector, bag scanner, and that ends up being followed with a verbal notice, which IS binding, right? So what is the out here? It seems to me completely against the spirit of the written law, but might actually have found a loophole. Can I do something about this? Who should I write to or talk with? Recommendations?
The facility in question is responsible for collecting property tax, vehicle registration fees, and performing title transfers and the like. It is definitely not a court or a city council meeting. I don't know if they have the whole building or what else might be contained in this building.
This ticked me off. It seems such an abuse of power and blatant disregard for my rights. Am I off base? I'm interested in recommendations.