Page 15 of 70
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:09 pm
by mojo84
K5GU wrote:K5GU wrote:mojo84 wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:TVGuy wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?
Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.
Chas.
Thank you, Charles. Any idea of a reason Stickland would do that?
Not that I can post.
Chas.
Probably because of the same reasons that are running through my head. I can't post those thoughts either or you or Keith would bust me again for being a bad guy.
The "strict enforcement" rule when in effect, allows the speaker to only acknowledge one yea and one nay verbally (hand raised fingers) and the remainder votes must be from each member's chair.
And I think Stickland also wanted a "record vote" on every amendment. Speaker Straus sort of truncated that from his response to Stickland. It's probably that most amendments to HB910 will be a "record vote" anyway, so it looks like just another way to prolong passage.
Why do you keep trying to explain this to me when I already understand what is going on?
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:11 pm
by Roger Howard
Now we need liability insurance
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:11 pm
by RPBrown
Liability insurance? Really?
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:11 pm
by gdanaher
Liability insurance??? Really?
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:11 pm
by K5GU
mojo84 wrote:K5GU wrote:K5GU wrote:mojo84 wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:TVGuy wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:TVGuy wrote:What was the "strict enforcement" motion that Stickland just made?
Must vote from their own desk and cannot vote for another Member.
Chas.
Thank you, Charles. Any idea of a reason Stickland would do that?
Not that I can post.
Chas.
Probably because of the same reasons that are running through my head. I can't post those thoughts either or you or Keith would bust me again for being a bad guy.
The "strict enforcement" rule when in effect, allows the speaker to only acknowledge one yea and one nay verbally (hand raised fingers) and the remainder votes must be from each member's chair.
And I think Stickland also wanted a "record vote" on every amendment. Speaker Straus sort of truncated that from his response to Stickland. It's probably that most amendments to HB910 will be a "record vote" anyway, so it looks like just another way to prolong passage.
Why do you keep trying to explain this to me when I already understand what is going on?
Explain what?
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:11 pm
by treadlightly
Liability insurance for toting a gun? The gun IS my insurance!
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:12 pm
by Callaway
treadlightly wrote:Liability insurance for toting a gun? The gun IS my insurance!
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:12 pm
by Jason73
Seriously?!?! To exercise my "right" to carry, I have to have liability insurance?? Driving a car is NOT a right. it is a privilege, that is not guaranteed by the Constitution. This is absolutely absurd!
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:12 pm
by mojo84
Since I am in the business I guess I should be for this one but I'm not.
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:12 pm
by Roger Howard
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:13 pm
by CoffeeNut
Someone send this to Rep. Phillips!
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:15 pm
by 74novaman
Jason73 wrote:Seriously?!?! To exercise my "right" to carry, I have to have liability insurance?? Driving a car is NOT a right. it is a privilege, that is not guaranteed by the Constitution. This is absolutely absurd!
Apparently requiring people to obtain an ID to vote is a horrible burden on those who are poor or live in underserved areas, but requiring a CHL class, a fee paid to the state and insurance to carry a gun is not.
Makes sense.
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:16 pm
by mojo84
He's comparing getting hit with a bullet to getting hit by a car.
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:17 pm
by K5GU
Regarding amendment 6 (Dutton) I wonder if I'd get a discount if I carried with a retention holster?
Re: HB910 Friday April 17, House Calendar for 2nd Reading
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:17 pm
by dru
So far, amendments 2-6 are all just shining examples of weapons grade stupidity. Who comes up with this crap? Badges and liability insurance, LMAO
