The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Well, they showed us, didn't they.Paladin wrote: Mon Jul 19, 2021 3:50 pm What the Democrats used to say about voting machines:
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status ... 00836?s=20
Guess it's convenient to forget that down the memory hole
philip964 wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:36 pm Twitter has banned the following accounts linked to the 2020 official election audits in the following states:
Arizona
Nevada
Georgia
Pennsylvania
So glad that Texas passed election reform!!!By now it’s a familiar story to many Americans that private money was just one of many irregularities that plagued the 2020 election. In numerous reports, the Capital Research Center has traced the flow of $350 million from Facebook founder and billionaire Mark Zuckerberg to county elections officials, flooding local jurisdictions with “Zuck bucks,” which aided with things like fraud-prone drop boxes and mail-in ballots.
Our conclusion is that, across the board, CTCL’s grants favored the biggest, most vote-rich Democratic counties, which helped turn out the most left-leaning voters in U.S. history—and secure Joe Biden as the country’s 46th president. Far from “nonpartisan,” CTCL’s oceans of money made it easier for fraudsters to cheat and the Democrats to win in 2020.
Now we turn to Texas and the $33.5 million in CTCL grants uncovered so far—the largest amount for any state we’ve examined.
...CTCL funded eight of the 10 most populous counties in Texas. The two that did not receive “Zuck Bucks”—Collin and Denton Counties—were the only two of the 10 that Trump won.
If by "wrong people" you mean ineligible voters, then, yeah.oohrah wrote: Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:18 am Yeah, now we don't have to worry about the "wrong people" voting.
No, I mean people of color. If you believe there was sufficient fraud to change the election, then you have been drinking the Republican kool-aid.
I am not sure whether there was enough fraud to swing the election or not. I am sure there has been fraud in every election since 1850 when Tammany Hall figured out how to rig NYC elections. I am also sure that without a thorough investigation we will not know how much. If there was so little fraud, why are people fighting an unbiased and fair investigation, including forensic audits of the voting and tabulating machines?oohrah wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:07 pm No, I mean people of color. If you believe there was sufficient fraud to change the election, then you have been drinking the Republican kool-aid.
And to take it to the end.... several sources have suggested that only 4-5 counties [in the entire country] were the difference in the election, so a relatively minor fraud could have easily been enough. Now I get that no single event was enough but when you have several attempts at several swing counties, it only takes a few instances.srothstein wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 7:04 pmI am not sure whether there was enough fraud to swing the election or not. I am sure there has been fraud in every election since 1850 when Tammany Hall figured out how to rig NYC elections. I am also sure that without a thorough investigation we will not know how much. If there was so little fraud, why are people fighting an unbiased and fair investigation, including forensic audits of the voting and tabulating machines?oohrah wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:07 pm No, I mean people of color. If you believe there was sufficient fraud to change the election, then you have been drinking the Republican kool-aid.
But on the side of if there was enough, we have an interesting contradiction going on. We are being told that there were isolated cases of fraud in insufficient amounts to make a difference. That sounds reasonable to me until I compare it to all the years I was told I should go vote because my one vote could make a difference. If my one vote properly cast can make a difference, then one fraudulent vote can make a difference. And almost everyone has agreed that there were some fraudulent votes.
oohrah wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:07 pmNo, I mean people of color. If you believe there was sufficient fraud to change the election, then you have been drinking the Republican kool-aid.
I am not aware of anything in the election integrity bill aimed at people of color, but there was plenty of stuff aimed are preventing vote harvesting and other forms of voter fraud. And that kind of fraud has been occurring in Texas since at least 1948 (and probably back to at least 1941). And voter fraud has definitely changed elections from time to time.oohrah wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:07 pmNo, I mean people of color. If you believe there was sufficient fraud to change the election, then you have been drinking the Republican kool-aid.