TexasCHLforum.com

Did anyone notice who is sitting front row center in front of TreyMom and TreyPop?

The Annoyed Man wrote:Did anyone notice who is sitting front row center in front of TreyMom and TreyPop?

Who is it? (Pretty in Pink?)

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:Did anyone notice who is sitting front row center in front of TreyMom and TreyPop?

Who is it? (Pretty in Pink?)

It's the original Zimmerman prosecutor, the one who is being indicted for falsifying the Zimmerman arrest warrant and complaint: http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/prne ... 02/CL41488

I read the judge directly questioned Zimmerman. Was that in open court?

Panda wrote:I read the judge directly questioned Zimmerman. Was that in open court?

The judge asked him if he wanted to testify. He said no.

Oh, and the jury was not present. It was after the last defense witness stepped down, court recessed, and the lawyers were doing some administrivia, entering last pieces of evidence into the trial.

Judge also denied another motion to acquit.



ETA: left out "not" in my comment on jury. makes a difference. sigh.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/10/doj-p ... -protests/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Your federal tax dollars went to help organize anti Zimmerman rallies in Florida per this article.

Have not vetted this website.

"That's why we make the big bucks"

The Annoyed Man wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:It's the original Zimmerman prosecutor, the one who is being indicted for falsifying the Zimmerman arrest warrant and complaint: http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/prne ... 02/CL41488

This is awesome. Does this carry normal force of law? Punishment? Never heard of a citizen's grand jury before.

xb12s wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:It's the original Zimmerman prosecutor, the one who is being indicted for falsifying the Zimmerman arrest warrant and complaint: http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/prne ... 02/CL41488

This is awesome. Does this carry normal force of law? Punishment? Never heard of a citizen's grand jury before.

No, it's the tin foil hat brigade. It has no force of law whatsoever.

philip964 wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/10/doj-p ... -protests/

Your federal tax dollars went to help organize anti Zimmerman rallies in Florida per this article.

Have not vetted this website.

"That's why we make the big bucks"

http://www.tpnn.com/department-of-injus ... zimmerman/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Another story about the same thing. This is from the Tea Party website.

Have not vetted this organization either. They seem to use the term impeachable offense regarding what happened. If what they did is true, it would seem like the first step to a "show trial". It would seem to me to be very hard to be a federal employee today.

Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

C-dub wrote:Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

If the "doll" is the woman pictured earlier in the thread? Well lets just say your even older than me.

C-dub wrote:Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

Yes, the prosecution handled it gently, but the defense slammed it to the ground, got on top , and beat its head into the floor. Asked the expert witness if the blows were too hard for the injury, and he said yes, so he than beat it slightly less hard and the witness agreed that would be approximately what happened. Defense demo made it more realistic for the jury to real get a clearer picture of the violence GZ was enduring. Brilliant.

philip964 wrote:

C-dub wrote:Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

If the "doll" is the woman pictured earlier in the thread? Well lets just say your even older than me.

Nope. It was some kind of foam mannequin that the prosecution brought in, but the defense exploited. G26ster summarized.

C-dub wrote:

philip964 wrote:

C-dub wrote:Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

If the "doll" is the woman pictured earlier in the thread? Well lets just say your even older than me.

Nope. It was some kind of foam mannequin that the prosecution brought in, but the defense exploited. G26ster summarized.

When MOM started the redirect, after the prosecution had used the mannequin, he asked the prosecution if he could "borrow their doll", while picking it up without waiting for a response. It could only have been better if he'd asked to "borrow their party doll".

C-dub wrote:Did anyone see what happened with the "doll" today? I read about it, but would have liked to have seen it when it happened.

I thought Omara did a really good job with it.