Re: Nobody but Ilhan Abdullahi Omar
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:12 pm
Omar is Al-Shabaab 4 Life.Grumpy1993 wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:00 pm If she watched Black Hawk Down, what side did she root for?
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Omar is Al-Shabaab 4 Life.Grumpy1993 wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:00 pm If she watched Black Hawk Down, what side did she root for?
Omar recently spoke in Florida at a private event hosted by Islamic Relief, a charity organization long said to have deep ties to groups that advocate terrorism against Israel.
Islamic Relief has come under congressional investigation for what lawmakers have described as its efforts to provide assistance to terrorist group such as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. The charity has been banned by some countries as a result of these ties.
"I just wonder what is Rep. Omar saying to a group of Islamic supporters that she feels is so secretive that she cannot say it to the American people, as a whole?" Stern wondered. "What is so secretive that it has to be off the record and closed to reporters? Will she say the same things in public to her Jewish voters in Minnesota that she says to her Islamic friends? What does this tell us about her openness, her honesty and her integrity?"
ILHAN OMAR’S JEWISH COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR IS HELPING HER RIGHT THE WRONGS
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Judge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Fair enough. Then answer this one question please:Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
The Muslim Brotherhood is power hungry organization. At many times, it was opearting in secrecy. I do not like them at all.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:58 amFair enough. Then answer this one question please:Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
Do you agree that the Muslim Brotherhood, and it's US fund raising propaganda arm, CAIR, are terrorist organizations?
It is not un-American to question someone's loyalty to the United States, especially, when that person is known to support beliefs contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States and is a member of congress. The challenge with Islam and many Muslims is that their holy book combines religion and politics/government. Therefore, they are the ones that do the conflating.Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
Ok, so let's try this. As an American, and as a practicing Jew, I do not hesitate to challenge, to argue, and to condemn those (typically left wing) Jews who I believe, through their words and actions, are bent on destroying this country. I give you Chuck Schumer as "Exhibit A", may his memory be erased.mojo84 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:32 amIt is not un-American to question someone's loyalty to the United States, especially, when that person is known to support beliefs contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States and is a member of congress. The challenge with Islam and many Muslims is that their holy book combines religion and politics/government. Therefore, they are the ones that do the conflating.Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
Whether it is kosher or not, I have no clue since I am not Jewish. However, it seems to be ok for a Muslim to question a Jew or Christian beliefs and patriotism but not the other way around. When there is a group that wants to change the fundamentals of our country or eliminate it and it by whatever means necessary based upon their holy book, it is very American to call them out on it, especially, if someone that holds such beliefs is a member of congress.
Is is very tough to reconcile the three religions when the discussion seem to always comes down fighting and conquering the other.
Could not agree more with this post. Politics and Islam are intertwined like Siamese twins with a deeply anti-Jewish bias and and an end-game to impose the religious tenets by force if necessary.mojo84 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:32 am
It is not un-American to question someone's loyalty to the United States, especially, when that person is known to support beliefs contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States and is a member of congress. The challenge with Islam and many Muslims is that their holy book combines religion and politics/government. Therefore, they are the ones that do the conflating.
Whether it is kosher or not, I have no clue since I am not Jewish. However, it seems to be ok for a Muslim to question a Jew or Christian beliefs and patriotism but not the other way around. When there is a group that wants to change the fundamentals of our country or eliminate it and it by whatever means necessary based upon their holy book, it is very American to call them out on it, especially, if someone that holds such beliefs is a member of congress.
Is is very tough to reconcile the three religions when the discussion seem to always comes down fighting and conquering the other.
I clearly stated that terrorism is forbidden in Islam. So condemning it is just a lip service for a practicing Muslim. You may care to hear me condemn it, but the matter of fact, it is forbidden in Islam.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:44 amOk, so let's try this. As an American, and as a practicing Jew, I do not hesitate to challenge, to argue, and to condemn those (typically left wing) Jews who I believe, through their words and actions, are bent on destroying this country. I give you Chuck Schumer as "Exhibit A", may his memory be erased.mojo84 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:32 amIt is not un-American to question someone's loyalty to the United States, especially, when that person is known to support beliefs contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States and is a member of congress. The challenge with Islam and many Muslims is that their holy book combines religion and politics/government. Therefore, they are the ones that do the conflating.Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
Whether it is kosher or not, I have no clue since I am not Jewish. However, it seems to be ok for a Muslim to question a Jew or Christian beliefs and patriotism but not the other way around. When there is a group that wants to change the fundamentals of our country or eliminate it and it by whatever means necessary based upon their holy book, it is very American to call them out on it, especially, if someone that holds such beliefs is a member of congress.
Is is very tough to reconcile the three religions when the discussion seem to always comes down fighting and conquering the other.
Now I have socialized with Beiruty, I have gone shooting together with him, and I find him to an engaging and intelligent individual. But I remain puzzled by what I perceive as a reluctance on his part to clearly publicly condemn Omar and Islamic terror. But perhaps I am wrong and it may simply be that as an American I am more direct, or even blunt in my speech. To the point where my speech would be considered impolite were I to be overseas.
What say you both?
I pm'ed you my position and that's all you will get from me. Learn to recognize when someone is not arguing against you. Maybe, I'm not direct enough. Apparently Redneck Buddha understood my comment.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:44 amOk, so let's try this. As an American, and as a practicing Jew, I do not hesitate to challenge, to argue, and to condemn those (typically left wing) Jews who I believe, through their words and actions, are bent on destroying this country. I give you Chuck Schumer as "Exhibit A", may his memory be erased.mojo84 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:32 amIt is not un-American to question someone's loyalty to the United States, especially, when that person is known to support beliefs contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States and is a member of congress. The challenge with Islam and many Muslims is that their holy book combines religion and politics/government. Therefore, they are the ones that do the conflating.Beiruty wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:41 amJudge Perro in the above article was Attacking Muslims 1stA or Questioning their loyalty to US. That is un-American. Not Kosher, Mr. Bitter.Bitter Clinger wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:11 am Judge Jeanine Was Right About Rep. Omar
http://drcarolehhaynes.com/index.php/ar ... -was-rightThe Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
Muslims would defend their 1stA right with their 2ndA right.
Please, do not conflagrate Hamas/Islamists Brotherhood with US politics.
Whether it is kosher or not, I have no clue since I am not Jewish. However, it seems to be ok for a Muslim to question a Jew or Christian beliefs and patriotism but not the other way around. When there is a group that wants to change the fundamentals of our country or eliminate it and it by whatever means necessary based upon their holy book, it is very American to call them out on it, especially, if someone that holds such beliefs is a member of congress.
Is is very tough to reconcile the three religions when the discussion seem to always comes down fighting and conquering the other.
Now I have socialized with Beiruty, I have gone shooting together with him, and I find him to an engaging and intelligent individual. But I remain puzzled by what I perceive as a reluctance on his part to clearly publicly condemn Omar and Islamic terror. But perhaps I am wrong and it may simply be that as an American I am more direct, or even blunt in my speech. To the point where my speech would be considered impolite were I to be overseas.
What say you both?