Page 3 of 3

Re: New Republican Party Chariman is for AWB

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:17 am
by asleepatthereel
Excaliber wrote:We need a "Neither Party" - neither democrat nor republican, made up of honest folks loyal to the Constitution and working for the good of the nation.

If I had my druthers, I'd vote to call it the "Patriot Party."

But then again, "Neither Party" would probably work just as well.
How about "Constitutional Conservative Party"? If we could round up enough TRUE conservatives, AKA "Neo-Cons" as the left likes to call them, I would be quick to jump on the wagon. I really wish people like Ron Paul wouldnt go out of their way to act like nut jobs. He has alot of good ideas I could get behind if not for the fact that he acts like he is about to go off the deep end at any time. As for the Congress, Ive said it before and Ill say it again; If term limits are good enough for the Presidency, why is it that they are not good for them? How long has that bloated windbag from Mass been in the Senate?
I still cant understand why any Senator would want to run for President. The Senate is where the power is, not the Oval Office.

Re: New Republican Party Chariman is for AWB

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:10 am
by Oldgringo
asleepatthereel wrote:

...How long has that bloated windbag from Mass been in the Senate?...

1. I agree that there should be term limits on all of 'em - including federal judges.
2. What does it say about an electorate that keeps electing the likes of 'those bloated windbags (there are two) from Mass' or the former Kluxer from WV?