The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
I dont think I took your name yesterday Joe. I turned the list in to charles last night tho so cant remember for sure.joe817 wrote:Oh dear! I've been here 9 months almost exactly to the day.I will not go look up this stat but there is no doubt in my mind we have had to discipline more in the last 9 months than in the previous 4.5yrs.Am I in trouble again?
Uh Oh, there's a list...Yikeslongtooth wrote:I dont think I took your name yesterday Joe. I turned the list in to charles last night tho so cant remember for sure.joe817 wrote:Oh dear! I've been here 9 months almost exactly to the day.I will not go look up this stat but there is no doubt in my mind we have had to discipline more in the last 9 months than in the previous 4.5yrs.
LT
Haha, Easy now. No big heads!longtooth wrote:OH my goodness. Our hats just grew 4 sizes. Thank you shortysboy.
Seriously now.
Yes it is a lot of reading. I confess that in the beginning I had the time to help new shooters learn about arms, range time, gear & carry. One of the mods did the math a few weeks ago. During the day & evening we have to read & if necessary deal w/ a post a minute. At most there are 3 of us on the board at a time.
Thank you for the compliment.
LT
And may I take this opportunity to compliment all of you on what excellent judge's of character you all are.USA1 wrote:Uh Oh, there's a list...Yikeslongtooth wrote:I dont think I took your name yesterday Joe. I turned the list in to charles last night tho so cant remember for sure.
Don't worry Joe. You're one of the most respected members here.
A very valid point that you make however. The moderators here have not attacked someone that was acting for showing emotions. You can't take things personally because they're not meant that way. The problem I ran into when I was a moderator was that when I disciplined someone for violating a rule they thought I was personally out to get them and I did it just because I didn't like them. But, that's just simply not the way it is. When someone gets disciplined they should change the subject and move on. If you dwell on it then it causes problems.03Lightningrocks wrote:When there are 5000 people involved, it is highly unlikely that you will find everyone has the same opinions on anything. It is human nature to feel challenged when one is approached with an opinion that conflicts with their own. It is also human nature to bring others into ones way of thinking. This creates debate...which can trigger emotions... in normal folks, lawyers typically don't have this issue... it is what makes them lawyers.
This would be a very boring forum if we had no diversity. If everyone here just parrots the opinion of the mods, it won't be long before this forum is back to 100 members again.
Ditto from me shortysboy09.longtooth wrote:OH my goodness. Our hats just grew 4 sizes. Thank you shortysboy.
Seriously now.
Yes it is a lot of reading. I confess that in the beginning I had the time to help new shooters learn about arms, range time, gear & carry. One of the mods did the math a few weeks ago. During the day & evening we have to read & if necessary deal w/ a post a minute. At most there are 3 of us on the board at a time.
Thank you for the compliment.
LT
Even in all this you and I have grounds for agreement. If the sign we are talking about is a 30:06 sign that is improperly posted, I can understand why you would want to crusade to get the sign changed. I am one of those folks who doesn't carry a tape measure, so I have no way of judging letter spacing or other details. I also don't carry around a copy of the exact proper wording, so if a few words are wrong, I would never know it. How I handle this is simple, I see a 30:06 sign and I assume I am not welcomed, regardless of the technicalities involved.jimlongley wrote:And that would be me, because my feeling is that, just as one of our members recently experienced, even if they have the wrong signage or just plain don't know the law, you are likely to take the ride.03Lightningrocks wrote:Then there are those who feel the need to call up the folks with signs that don't count and risk having them correct the situation by giving them lessons on how to properly deny me my right to carry. If the sign is not a 30:06 sign, my assumption is always that they don't want to forbid licensed carry. They are wanting to forbid armed robbers from bringing a gun to the robbery. I see no need to ask them if I am correct as the law already says I am.marksiwel wrote: The Sign is incorrect in some way but no one wants to test it
and
Some says "Concealed Means Concealed" implying they should just carry anyway
Let them know that their sign is wrong, and that you will most likely beat the charge, and that you will also hold them responsible. And also let them know what the compliant sign is, and the fact that it is about 2' by 3' and really ugly.
Let them know that they are only denying law abiding citizens access because criminals won't care what signs are posted, and that you will be influencing others to boycott their business as much as is in their power.
If they repost, all well and good, they don't want your business and they have proved it, and there is no place that posts that can't be replaced. If they don't repost, and you get made, and you wind up taking the ride, the basis for your civil suit is the hard copy letter, registered, return receipt, notifying them that their sign does not comply with Texas law and stating what the law is.
Uh oh...didn't know about "the list." Hope I'm not on it. I haven't been disciplined yet....at least not directly. Should I expect a time out????longtooth wrote:I dont think I took your name yesterday Joe. I turned the list in to charles last night tho so cant remember for sure.joe817 wrote:Oh dear! I've been here 9 months almost exactly to the day.I will not go look up this stat but there is no doubt in my mind we have had to discipline more in the last 9 months than in the previous 4.5yrs.
LT
I agree with your post to the letter. Off topic, but very good post.03Lightningrocks wrote:
Even in all this you and I have grounds for agreement. If the sign we are talking about is a 30:06 sign that is improperly posted, I can understand why you would want to crusade to get the sign changed. I am one of those folks who doesn't carry a tape measure, so I have no way of judging letter spacing or other details. I also don't carry around a copy of the exact proper wording, so if a few words are wrong, I would never know it. How I handle this is simple, I see a 30:06 sign and I assume I am not welcomed, regardless of the technicalities involved.
On the other hand, if I see a gun busters sign, I assume the place is simply trying to appease the masses. Maybe they just posted the sign because it was in the package of signs they received when they opened shop and it looked cool. What ever the reason, I see no reason to complain about the way the coffee tastes if I am not drinking the coffee.
I think we are off topic...LOL.
Other than your first sentence, I am not sure what your response has to do with my post. I haven't witnessed anyone attacking a mod around here. On the contrary, I see major sucking up most of the time. Heck, just look at this thread. If the mods aren't feeling tingles by now, they never will.shortysboy09 wrote:A very valid point that you make however. The moderators here have not attacked someone that was acting for showing emotions. You can't take things personally because they're not meant that way. The problem I ran into when I was a moderator was that when I disciplined someone for violating a rule they thought I was personally out to get them and I did it just because I didn't like them. But, that's just simply not the way it is. When someone gets disciplined they should change the subject and move on. If you dwell on it then it causes problems.03Lightningrocks wrote:When there are 5000 people involved, it is highly unlikely that you will find everyone has the same opinions on anything. It is human nature to feel challenged when one is approached with an opinion that conflicts with their own. It is also human nature to bring others into ones way of thinking. This creates debate...which can trigger emotions... in normal folks, lawyers typically don't have this issue... it is what makes them lawyers.
This would be a very boring forum if we had no diversity. If everyone here just parrots the opinion of the mods, it won't be long before this forum is back to 100 members again.
At the end of the day the rules are exactly what they say and the moderators job is to keep everyone within those boundaries to keep the forum civil.
It is??? That's odd. I don't feel challenged at all when someone has a different opinion than my own. Because that's all it is...a difference of opinion. A diversity. It's not right or wrong....just different. I am secure enough in my opinions and convictions to believe I am not attacked when someone has a different opinion than mine.It is human nature to feel challenged when one is approached with an opinion that conflicts with their own.
IMHO, this occurs only when one tries to impress upon another their way of thinking and takes it beyond the norm of congenial discord. To me this indicates a need to control another peoples thoughts, which I don't care for in the least.It is also human nature to bring others into ones way of thinking. This creates debate...which can trigger emotions...
