Page 3 of 4
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:05 am
by DoubleJ
HotLeadSolutions wrote:DoubleJ wrote:April Fool's joke, obviously

Were you saying that my post was an April Fools joke? or were you referring to the post "yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol" by Alvins?
If you're offended by one, it was the other.

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:07 am
by 74novaman
title should have read "Actor disses gun he knows nothing about, favors gun he also knows nothing about."
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:25 pm
by McKnife
74novaman wrote:title should have read "Actor disses gun he knows nothing about, favors gun he also knows nothing about."

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:26 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
DoubleJ wrote:HotLeadSolutions wrote:DoubleJ wrote:April Fool's joke, obviously

Were you saying that my post was an April Fools joke? or were you referring to the post "yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol" by Alvins?
If you're offended by one, it was the other.

I love this.

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:24 am
by Toorop
I love that line. But I am a big fan of the Glock. Especially the 9mm guns.
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:25 pm
by shipwreck
Guess I have 7 sissy guns :)

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:31 pm
by warhorse10_9
shipwreck wrote:Guess I have 7 sissy guns :)

At least they are not nickel plated sissy guns

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:54 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
warhorse10_9 wrote:shipwreck wrote:Guess I have 7 sissy guns :)

At least they are not nickel plated sissy guns

Not nickel plated, but sissy guns just the same.

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:38 am
by rm9792
Had to watch it last nite. Actual line was nickel plated sissy pistol. Just nitpicking. :)
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:52 am
by 92f-fan
03Lightningrocks wrote:warhorse10_9 wrote:shipwreck wrote:Guess I have 7 sissy guns :)

At least they are not nickel plated sissy guns

Not nickel plated, but sissy guns just the same.

You seemed to like the way the Stainless sissy gun shot at the range a few weeks back .... LOL
And you didnt call it a sissy gun then... Maybe because we were both armed ....

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:40 am
by RSJ
I could see a need for seven Glocks, but not seven sissy guns.
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:04 am
by zero4o3
RSJ wrote:I could see a need for seven Glocks, but not seven sissy guns.
melt down the plastic and mold it into a holster for a real gun?

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:24 pm
by texanron
zero4o3 wrote:RSJ wrote:I could see a need for seven Glocks, but not seven sissy guns.
melt down the plastic and mold it into a holster for a real gun?

Even if you put a Glock on the surface of the Sun it wouldn't melt those things are so tough!

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:10 pm
by shipwreck
03Lightningrocks wrote:warhorse10_9 wrote:shipwreck wrote:Guess I have 7 sissy guns :)

At least they are not nickel plated sissy guns

Not nickel plated, but sissy guns just the same.

Whatever dude. I like em just fine... I've owned a LOT of handguns over the years... I've owned a ton of different brands. I would not have stocked into so many of the same brand and variant years ago. But currently, with owning so many things in the past, these are my fav. They work for me, and I like being able to shoot different guns, but yet have the target practice transfer into ANY of the guns (since they are so close)
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:24 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
RSJ wrote:I could see a need for seven Glocks, but not seven sissy guns.
