The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
AWESOME VIDEO. AWESOME.JALLEN wrote:Morgan is a regular participant at SigForum.com, where there is a thread of this episode this morning. You can go over there and congratulate him, but I guess you'd have to register.
Here's a similar article on MSNBC of all places..JALLEN wrote:In connection with the discussion about "assault rifle" vs. "assault weapon" you might consider this:
The Truth About Assault Weapons http://www.assaultweapon.info/
So let’s forgo the arbitrary, ambiguous, fear-mongering terms and get specific about what we actually mean by gun control. It may be politically effective to rail against “rapid-fire, high-capacity assault weapons” but it doesn’t actually mean anything. If we’re serious about solving gun crime, we should at least start by getting the terms right.
On MSNBC, I thought I was having a stroke when I read the opinion piece. Of course the first comment was an attack on the writer and made refernce to youtube videos of someone "bump-firing" a Bushmaster AR15. So that would make the gun capable of "rapid fire, high capacity assault". lol, they'll never stop/learn.RoyGBiv wrote:Here's a similar article on MSNBC of all places..JALLEN wrote:In connection with the discussion about "assault rifle" vs. "assault weapon" you might consider this:
The Truth About Assault Weapons http://www.assaultweapon.info/
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/15/a-gun-le ... ccurately/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So let’s forgo the arbitrary, ambiguous, fear-mongering terms and get specific about what we actually mean by gun control. It may be politically effective to rail against “rapid-fire, high-capacity assault weapons” but it doesn’t actually mean anything. If we’re serious about solving gun crime, we should at least start by getting the terms right.