Page 3 of 4
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:03 pm
by Abraham
Her latest gaffe may sink her.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:43 pm
by CHLLady
You got that right Abraham. She put her foot in it this time for sure. And so did her supporters claiming that he was running scared!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... avels.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Oops! AND the kicker for me is that her husband had custody of her kids while she went off to Harvard Law. Being a student while someone else is taking care of your kids and paying for your education isn't a struggle to me, it's a blessing. So I don't feel she can claim "poor little ol' me" status. The thing is, she re-pays hubby by leaving the very next day after he makes the last payment for her school. I wonder if she ever paid him back?
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:46 pm
by jmra
CHLLady wrote:You got that right Abraham. She put her foot in it this time for sure. And so did her supporters claiming that he was running scared!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... avels.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Oops! AND the kicker for me is that her husband had custody of her kids while she went off to Harvard Law. Being a student while someone else is taking care of your kids and paying for your education isn't a struggle to me, it's a blessing. So I don't feel she can claim "poor little ol' me" status. The thing is, she re-pays hubby by leaving the very next day after he makes the last payment for her school. I wonder if she ever paid him back?
Sounds like a gold digger who abandoned her own kids to me.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:24 am
by philip964
Found this today.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/co ... 164157.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
There is always another side to the story.
Pretty weak, but another side.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:19 am
by MeMelYup
Can't read it, have to join.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:31 pm
by RogueUSMC
James O'Keafe released an inside video of his on Wendy Davis today...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/01 ... isability/
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:46 pm
by The Annoyed Man
jmra wrote:CHLLady wrote:I'm not voting for them. While I admire the idea of 2 women running, it would never persuade me to vote for them, ever.
It sends chills up my spine knowing that the current administration took an active interest in Wendy. I do not want this admin's cronies in Texas planting seeds. Keep Texas for Texans!

I would never vote for anyone (nor would I admire anyone) based on gender. To do so is the very definition of sexism.
Much like what happened in 2008 and 2012........ except its racism rather than sexism. One should NEVER vote for a person for any reasons other than their policy positions and experience. Otherwise, we get an Obama or a Davis.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:53 pm
by android
Abraham wrote:Her latest gaffe may sink her.
I firmly believe ALL politicians and those running for political office lie regardless of party or how honest they claim to be. Some are just a lot better at not getting caught.
Lying about something so easily researched and disproved just shows how stupid she is. We already knew she lied, she's a politician. Now we know she's a stupid liar too.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:24 pm
by CHLLady
She's fired up now.
Saw my first Pro Wendy bumper sticker today.

Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:01 pm
by cprems
CHLLady wrote:She's fired up now.
Saw my first Pro Wendy bumper sticker today.

I think you misread the bumper sticker. It said GO Wendy ---------> and in small lettering (out of Texas) She should be ready for a move since she has raised about 85% of her "donations" from the East and West coast.
I hope she is beaten by double digits in November.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:44 am
by mojo84
Short article worth reading. Check out the links to the actual reports. You can learn a lot about someone by following the money.
http://blog.chron.com/texaspolitics/201 ... -donation/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:08 am
by mojo84
Here's an interesting note. Some of the contributors to the Davis campaign are also supporters of Joe Strauss and his crony politicos. Joe is also closely tied to some of the candidates that are running against truely conservative incumbents.
I'm learning the term "pro business" is actually a code phrase for crony business as usual among liberals that call themselves conservative Republicans.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:53 am
by android
mojo84 wrote:Here's an interesting note. Some of the contributors to the Davis campaign are also supporters of Joe Strauss and his crony politicos. Joe is also closely tied to some of the candidates that are running against truely conservative incumbents.
In learning the term "pro business" is actually a code phrase for crony business as usual among liberals that call themselves conservative Republicans.
Neither businesses or individuals should be subsidized by tax dollars. Period.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:16 pm
by mojo84
I agree. I also think we need to be more aware of how and to whom government contracts are awarded. Also how legislation affects political contributors.
Government subsidies tend to be the more obvious but that is just the tip of the iceberg.
Re: "Two-woman ticket"
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:25 am
by Jaguar
I just saw a blurb on DFW NBC station that Wendy Davis supports open carry.
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/politics/Wen ... 00111.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I guess she saw the dissatisfied group of gun people and now hopes to divide and conquer.