TexasCHLforum.com

puma guy wrote:Joe's wording is indeed unfortunate; especially when quoted out of context, but he would have been vilified no matter how he stated it. IMHO

THIS.

Like I said in the post immediately above this one, I have not followed the guy since he gained his original notoriety. But there is no doubt that that notoriety put him squarely in the crosshairs of anyone who takes the leftist view of things.....which includes anything gun-control related....

The Annoyed Man wrote:

puma guy wrote:Joe's wording is indeed unfortunate; especially when quoted out of context, but he would have been vilified no matter how he stated it. IMHO

THIS.

Like I said in the post immediately above this one, I have not followed the guy since he gained his original notoriety. But there is no doubt that that notoriety put him squarely in the crosshairs of anyone who takes the leftist view of things.....which includes anything gun-control related....

Some of the DailyKos types seem to have branded him official spokesman of the Tea Party and all things even slightly conservative. Like you, I had no idea he still had any kind of notoriety.

What I want to know: What is the conflict between right of children to live and the right to keep and bear arms?
Apparently I wasn't aware that they were somehow mutually exclusive.

ShepherdTX wrote:What I want to know: What is the conflict between right of children to live and the right to keep and bear arms?
Apparently I wasn't aware that they were somehow mutually exclusive.

JPFO says gun control kills kids.

The Annoyed Man wrote:I read the whole letter, and it didn't bother me at all.

If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.