TexasCHLforum.com

Shepherd Smith reported that the shooter asked what religion they were before he started shooting

NotRPB wrote:White House calls for tougher gun laws in wake of Oregon shooting
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... n-shooting

Wow. It took them 1.5 hours from the first 911 call to the issuing of their statement.

...And here is how the media functions: like dogs drooling for a T-Bone to fall from the table.

BBC article had a few pieces of info I had not seen.

Said it was a long gun.
Former school president said they had debated last year if they should have armed security, they don't.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34419802

Just watched his youtube and facebook vids

shooter was obviously addicted to flake websites

May the souls of those lost find respite in the and of the Lord. May their families and friends quickly be restored to peace. And may those responsible (including those that set policy to prohibit law abiding citizens from rightful self defense) rot in hell. And to those that can't wait to jump onto the bodies of the dead as their platform, go pound sand.

SA_Steve wrote:Just watched his youtube and facebook vids

shooter was obviously addicted to flake websites

How did you find it? I haven't seen anything about this guy at all, except that he's dead.

VMI77 wrote:We do and will have a choice though...that choice is going to be weather we refuse or obey whatever is forced upon us.

Bazinga.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

SA_Steve wrote:Just watched his youtube and facebook vids

shooter was obviously addicted to flake websites

How did you find it? I haven't seen anything about this guy at all, except that he's dead.

Oddly enough, it turns out that the clowns at 4Chan may be the ones outing him.

RoyGBiv wrote:

philip964 wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/10 ... free-zone/

Gunfree zone.

RIP

A quick read through Handgunlaw.us and the link below seems to initially indicate that public colleges cannot prohibit licensed concealed carry, but, I could be wrong about that....

http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/ORCt ... yCarry.pdf
Court decision invalidates OSU Systemwide handgun ban.

Therefore, we conclude that OAR 580-022-0045(3) is an exercise of an
7"authority to regulate" firearms that is not expressly authorized by the Legislative
8 Assembly, and that it is preempted by ORS 166.170(1).1 Accordingly, the rule exceeds
9 the agency's authority, ORS 183.400(4)(b), and is invalid.

Note: In Early March 2012 Oregon's State Board of Higher Education voted unanimously to ban all firearms on the system's seven campuses. Anyone who does any business on University property must agree not to carry any firearms. The policy allows people with Concealed Handgun License to be on campus but are barred from any Building or Arena. Any Student/Faculty or anyone who does business on University Property could be expelled from the property losing their student status or Job with the University System. Police and Military are exempt. By the Court Ruling they can not bar you from the buildings. I would use caution.

Obama on now talking about how bad guns are.

striker55 wrote:Obama on now talking about how bad guns are.

It's getting old. He knows he's full of it, everyone with half a brain knows he's full of it and the media is still eating it up.

striker55 wrote:Obama on now talking about how bad guns are.

I am unable to comment on his statement without violating forum rules.

RoyGBiv wrote:

striker55 wrote:Obama on now talking about how bad guns are.

I am unable to comment on his statement without violating forum rules.

I can. He uses the death of innocent people to advance his agenda.

philip964 wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:

striker55 wrote:Obama on now talking about how bad guns are.

I am unable to comment on his statement without violating forum rules.

I can. He uses the death of innocent people to advance his agenda.

Isn't his motto, "don't let a tragedy go to waste"?